The 2016 Appalachian Trail Thru-Hiker Survey: General Hiker Stats

For the third year now, we surveyed long-distance hikers who completed a section or thru-hike of the Appalachian Trail in 2016.

This year, we expanded the survey to include questions not only about main gear items, but also more detailed demographics, the timeline of their treks, their favorite sections of the Trail, the sections they found the most difficult, their hiking partners, and their adherence to Leave No Trace practices.


187 people who hiked on the Appalachian Trail in 2016 took the survey.


The average (mean) age of hikers in the survey was 31 years old, plus or minus 12 years, with a median age of 27 years old. Hikers ranged in age from 17 to 68.

Women comprised 42 % of hikers in the survey, while about 58% of hikers were men.

The vast majority (94%, = 174), of hikers in the survey were White. Six hikers were Asian, 4 were Hispanic/Latino, and two were multi-racial (White/Asian and Asian/Native American).


Nearly half of hikers in the survey had bachelors degrees. Note that the one hiker who had not yet finished high school was only 17 years old.

Education level


Nearly all hikers were from the U.S., with Canadians at a distant second.


Hikers were predominantly from the East Coast, particularly from states that the Appalachian Trail passes through.

Hiking basics



The majority of hikers had gone backpacking between 1 and 7 nights. Very few had no camping or hiking experience, just as very few had done long-distance backpacking.


Thru-hikers were the target of this survey, and comprised the majority of hikers who took it.


Of the 46 survey participants who did not thru-hike, only 13 had intended a section hike. The other 33 were unable to finish intended thru-hikes. Injuries were the most common reason that hikers quit. Note that six hikers were still on the Trail at the time they responded to the survey.



The vast majority of thru-hikers who took the survey walked northbound. This is by far the most common direction for AT thru-hikes, but southbounders were somewhat under-represented, due to time constraints in conducting the survey before many of them may have finished.


The majority of hikers started their hikes between early March and early April (with April 4 and 6 being the most popular dates), which is considered the “Bubble” for AT thru-hikes. The earliest hiker began December 29, 2015, and the latest start date was July 23, 2016.


Hikers who started early and late still reported satisfaction with the day they set out. Six hikers who began during the northbound “bubble” said it was too crowded, but nearly all who started at this time were satisfied with this, and one specified they preferred hiking with the bubble.

Interestingly, some hikers considered the “bubble” start dates both too early and too late, for weather reasons. Certainly, northbound hikers who begin in March will typically encounter some snow, and those who take more than six months will often encounter snow towards the end of their hike as well.


The most common finish dates, for thru-hikers in our northbound-biased sample, were in mid-to-late August and throughout September.


As with start dates, hikers were generally satisfied with the date they finished. The only hiker who found the trail too crowded on the finish date finished on a Saturday.


Overall, the average pace for long-distance hikers was exactly 16.0 miles per day, plus or minus 3.2 miles per day. However, there was a marked difference between distance that thru-hikers walked each day, compared to those who hiked a section (both as an intentional section or an incomplete thru-hike). The average pace for section hikers was 13.7 miles per day, plus or minus 3.3 miles. The average pace for  thru-hikers was 16.7 miles per day, plus or minus 2.8 miles.

Sections of the Appalachian Trail

We asked hikers to rate sections of the Trail for both how much they liked them and how difficult they were. Hikers could rate more than one section as “favorite,” “least favorite,” “most difficult,” and “easiest.” The percentages shown below exclude hikers who said they did not hike that section.


Favorite and Least Favorite Sections

Northern Pennsylvania, known in the hiker community as “Rocksylvania” for its rocky terrain, was by far the least liked section. It was also commonly rated as difficult (see below).

The section most commonly picked as a favorite was the Mt Rogers/Roane Highlands area, which is home to wild ponies. Baxter State Park, home of the AT’s northern terminus, Mt Katahdin, was a close second, followed by the White Mountain National Forest, southern Maine, the 100-Mile Wilderness, the Roanoke region (which includes well-known McAfee Knob and Dragons’ Tooth peaks), Vermont, and the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.


Easiest and Most Difficult Sections

As mentioned above, northern Pennsylvania was both widely disliked and frequently rated a most difficult section. However, the other most difficult sections of the Appalachian Trail were also among the favorites: The White Mountain National Forest, southern Maine, and Baxter State Park/Mt Katahdin.

The section rated easiest was Shenandoah National Park, which frequently crosses the Blue Ridge Parkway, such that it provides ample opportunities for “blue-blaze” road walking, “slack-packing,” and amenities (as well as frequent bear sightings). Other sections commonly considered easiest were Maryland (which features rolling hills and farmland), and the area around Harpers Ferry, West Virginia, which includes a flat walk alongside a canal and a historic town that is home of the Appalachian Trail Conservancy headquarters.




The majority of thru-hikers who took the survey set out alone, but most ended up hiking the majority of their trek with friends made on the trail. 18 of the 20 who hiked with significant others finished with their significant other, and two hikers who set out alone met a significant other on the trail. Of the two dogs who accompanied hikers in our survey, only one finished the thru-hike.

Leave-no-trace practices


I was encouraged to see that 93 percent of hikers reported they packed out all of their own trash and a large portion of these (39%) sometimes packed out other litter. Admirably, sixteen of these hikers packed out all trash they saw!

A few hikers (4.8%) either packed out or burned their trash. Burning trash is a controversial practice which I have sometimes seen recommended by trail clubs and park maintenance, but it is typically not considered best practice for outdoor ethics. 3 hikers in our survey admitted to leaving trash behind intentionally; two did so to shed weight and one did so as “trail magic.” If you are one of the well-meaning hikers who leaves trail magic unattended, especially if you hike on without returning to clean up the mess, please know that this is NOT a good deed. You are creating a hazard for local wildlife, who should be prioritized above providing assistance to humans in the area.

Additionally, I ran a correlation to see if there was any relationship between experience hiking and leave-no-trace practice. However, there was no relationship (= -.052, = .47).


We asked hikers in the survey how much the spent on gear for their hike, then how much they spent total (gear and expenses along the way).


The average amount spent on gear alone was between $1000 and $2000, but anything from $500 to $3000 was fairly common. The average amount spent on all thru-hike expenses was $4000 to $6000, although about a quarter of thru-hikers spent more than $6000 and about a quarter spent less than $4000.

I followed up by asking hikers if they found their budget sufficient. All but 12 thru-hikers said their budget was sufficient.


In the graph above, the light blue mark shows the percent of thru-hikers who said the amount they budgeted for gear was not enough. Note that a few people in the average range found their budgets insufficient, but those who had extremely small budgets didn’t report they needed more.


Interestingly, the only thru-hikers who found their total budget insufficient were those on the high end of the amount they could spend. This suggests that some individuals will want or need to spend much more than the rest, possibly because of expensive stops in town, although this could be due to illness, injury, or any other reason.


We asked hikers which resources they found helpful or inspiring and which ones were not. We also asked them what other resources they used that we hadn’t mentioned.


By far the most helpful (and perhaps inspiring) resource for long-distance hikers on the AT is The A.T. Guide by David “AWOL” Miller. This guidebook includes elevation profiles, maps of trail towns, hostel rates and contact information, locations of water sources, shelters, side trails, and just about every feature of the AT that hikers would want to know about. It also has additional information on access to the southern and northern terminuses. It should be noted that the ATC publishes a similar guidebook that 12 percent of hikers found helpful (14 percent did not like it).

Here are links to resources (where possible), in order of their popularity:

  1. The A.T. Guide by David “AWOL” Miller
  3. The Appalachian Trail Conservancy website
  4. The GutHooks app on iTunes and on Google Play
  5. Appalachian Trials – the book
  7. A Walk in the Woods – the book
  9. The Appalachian Trail Thru-Hiker’s Companion (The ATC’s guidebook)
  10. The AT subreddit

Facebook groups, YouTube videos, and Instagram pages were all cited as helpful or inspiring. There are Facebook groups by class of thru-hikers (e.g., “Class of 2017”), a separate one for women, and one for the Appalachian Long Distance Hiking Association. These can be located with a simple search.

The only resources that were more often disliked than liked were A Walk in the Woods (the movie), the ATC’s guidebook, and workshops for preparing for a thru-hike.

Festivals and Check-Ins


Almost 4 in 10 hikers in our survey attended Trail Days in Damascus, VA, but very few attended the kick-offs at Harpers Ferry or Spring Mountain. Most did not attend any of these.


Regarding thru-hikers only, about 6 in 10 checked in at Springer Mountain, 9 in 10 checked in at Harpers Ferry, and about 8 in 10 checked in at Mount Katahdin. Checking in with the ATC helps them research surges in numbers of hikers and to prepare for future maintenance of the trail. It can be fun for hikers, too, because they will disclose the number of hikers who have passed through before you (for example, “you’re the 120th thru-hiker this year!”).

More “By the Numbers”

This is the first post on the hikers of 2016. Other posts from this survey are on backpacks, footwearshelter systems, sleeping bags, stoves, food, and water, and sleeping pads.

Muchas gracias

CONGRATULATIONS and many thanks to all the hikers who took the survey! Best of luck to those who are still on the Trail. Thanks also to Zach Davis for spreading the word about the survey and for his input regarding its content.

Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 20

  • Mary Beth Skylis : Nov 7th

    I’m always SO astounded by the education factor here. You kindof figure that out while you’re talking to other hikers but almost 3/4 have a Bachelors or higher education. That’s incredible. And a wonderful testament to the type of people that value the outdoors. Odie’s not wrong when he says that these people could change the world.

    Sorry for the nerd session. Awesome piece, Mariposa.

  • TBR : Nov 7th

    Interesting data.

    No wonder the trail is overwhelmed at the Georgia end … so many people starting at roughly the same time.

    More women hiking now than when I hoofed along, some years ago. Nice to see that.

    • Mariposa : Nov 8th

      According to the ATC, about 25% of 2,000 milers are women, so they are over-represented in our sample. But still, we’re getting there!

  • Brian : Nov 7th

    Can you clarify whether the prior camping experience question refers to the longest trip people had taken, or the total amount of nights people had taken over all trips prior to the Trail?

    I’d also be curious as to whether this includes shakedown hikes, which seem to be the first experience for many who write on this blog.

    • Mariposa : Nov 7th

      Good question – I should have made that more clear. The exact question was, “before this year, how long was your longest backpacking trip?”

  • Alex : Nov 8th

    Thumbs up for making the effort to make this survey ! I tis very educational to other people who intend to make the hike – either section or thruogh hike. if statistics like this were available in past years, hikers would be better prepared to identify and manage the risks and may be more people would finish the through hike !
    My gratitude for conducting and publishing the information and I hope you yould be able to do that next year too !

  • Kate : Nov 8th

    Since I am SOBO 2017, it would have been awesome to have the SOBO start dates highlighted in the stats so I can better see where the bubble was … totally appreciated the survey, your efforts and the data results. Thanks for doing this!!!

  • Jo : Nov 8th

    How did you get this sample of hikers? How representative do you think this sample is of the population of 2016 thru hikers?

    • Mariposa : Nov 8th

      We recruited people for the survey through various facebook groups for Appalachian Trail long distance hikers.

      Women are over-represented in our sample. The ATC reports that 25% of 2,000 milers are women (this includes those who complete the whole thing in sections over several years). When I checked their page last year, I think it said 20%, so I believe they are keeping this updated.

      They also report that over half of thru-hikers are in their twenties and the median section hikers is in their 40’s. So, I think the ages in our sample are fairly representative.

      Here’s the link to the ATC’s demographic stats:

  • Pony (Clay Evans) : Nov 8th

    I love seeing these survey statistics; thanks for doing this!

    I am one of the 54-year-old thru hikers on the survey. I’m surprised by a few things:

    * I would have pegged the percentage of women at closer to 30-40%. However, to my eye there were proportionally more women finishers (I SOBO’d Maine and NH after going GA>VT NOBO) than at the beginning of the trail, which suggests they are tough!
    * I can’t believe anyone thinks Maine or New Hampshire, hard as they are, are the worst parts of the trail.
    *Respondents who claim southern Maine and the Whites are an “easy” part of the trail? They are punking you!

    I look forward to reading the gear responses.


  • Lee : Nov 12th

    I like the question about significant others doing the trail together or finding a significant other. I wonder what percentage of the hikers is part of the LGBTQ community. It would be nice to know the trail is safe and that I might even find a soulmate.

  • John L : Nov 12th

    This is exactly the type of information I seek as I prepare for my SOBO Flip Flop starting in HF WVA in 107 days. I’ve hiked a good bit, camped overnight none, and will turn 66 on the trail. 16 mpd is more than I expect to achieve thus my early start and November estimated completion date back at HF WVA. I’m concerned about injuries, but this lessens my concern. La Niña has me concerned about water mid-hike, but I’ll be better able to evaluate that then. My wife will start with me and will at a minimum hang with me the first 6 weeks either as a hiker or support crew at her choice to get my trail legs under me before I’m solo. I’ve dried and frozen a freezer full of fresh fruits and veggies and now start on meats. Thanks for the info. It dovetails with my other prep work.


  • dj : Nov 14th

    Great info! Quick question. Were average miles per day calculated by dividing total days to complete trail to total miles covered or by average total miles covered only on those days the person was actually hiking.

    • Mariposa : Mar 6th

      Good question. I just asked how many miles they hiked per day. I didn’t intend for survey participants to exclude zeroes from this average, but they may have done so.

  • Mark Stanavage : Feb 26th

    Thank you for your time and effort! If many are carrying their trash and others, it makes it tough to fathom the amount I see. Maybe some outreach to day hikers and groups. To those like me, who take pride in stewardship of the trail, you have my thanks and the respect of your peers.

  • retired firefighter, Tim Andrew : Mar 1st

    This is vital information for my 2018 trip….very, very good.

  • Doctari : Jul 31st

    When I started to section hike in 89 there were NO solo females in the bubble that I was with, a few with their SO, but not even a rumor of an hiking alone. This year (2017) I met 4, & heard of “quite a few” ahead of & behind me!
    I think the 25% posted here may be at least close. And I might add, a great trend! Hiking isn’t male only!
    Thanks for the survey, a bit of an eye opener. Keep it up!!!

  • Alex Barday : Aug 23rd

    Mariposa, you’ve done a tremendous job on this report! Would it be in any way possible to obtain the raw data from this report? I am planning a trip myself and would love to create an interactive dashboard from the data in this report using Tableau. Please feel free to email me any questions or concerns regarding my request, I look forward to hearing back from you.

  • Camping : May 7th

    I’m excited to discover this website. I wanted to thank you for your time just
    for this wonderful read!! I definitely really liked every little bit of it and i also
    have you bookmarked to look at new things on your blog.


What Do You Think?