ATC Rejects Mountain Valley Pipeline Opponents’ Request to See $19.5 Million Agreement

The Appalachian Trail Conservancy this week denied a request to release the full text of its August 2020 “voluntary stewardship agreement” with Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC, the company overseeing construction of a 303-mile natural-gas pipeline that will cross the Appalachian Trail near Pearisburg, Va.

Opponents of the pipeline delivered a petition signed by more than 400 “ATC members, volunteers and/or Trail supporters” to ATC President and CEO Sandra Marra and the board of directors Feb. 16.

On Monday, the ATC informed the petitioners that it would not make the agreement public.

“As a matter of ATC’s policies, standard philanthropic practice, and for reasons that have been previously discussed, the voluntary stewardship agreement with the Mountain Valley Pipeline and The Conservation Fund is private,” the ATC said in a statement, which included a link to the August announcement of the agreement.

A map showing the proposed route of the Mountain Valley Pipeline in Giles County, Virginia.

Under the agreement, MVP committed up to $19.5 million “for use by the Conservancy to conserve land along the Trail corridor and support outdoor recreation-based economies in Virginia and West Virginia,” according to the ATC.

Opponents criticized the ATC’s continued unwillingness to make the agreement public.

“The ATC’s actions are a truly grotesque departure from their public ‘Identity Statement,’ which claims the ‘Conservancy’s staff and board embodies honesty, mutual respect, openness, continuous learning and improvement, and excellence,'” ATC member Russell Chisholm said in a statement released Feb. 24. “Instead, the decision to enter into a Voluntary Stewardship Agreement and refuse to provide transparency about the decision inappropriately prioritizes the power of the Board over the wishes of ATC members and the public.”

Releasing Agreement Would ‘Harm Trust’

In an interview with The Trek published Feb. 16, ATC Senior Regional Director Andrew Downs said that keeping the agreement under wraps was part of the initial conditions set for negotiations and revealing it now would damage the ATC’s credibility in future negotiations.

“To release an agreement, when we said we wouldn’t, could harm trust in us,” he said.

Downs said that MVP had already given “about half” of the $19.5 million. The full amount is contingent upon completion of the project, he said, but the ATC will keep all funds provided under the agreement.

Under the current plan, the pipeline will cross the trail 110 feet below the surface for about 600 feet. It also will run parallel to the trail for about 12 miles, four miles off the trail along the Virginia-West Virginia border north of Peters Mountain.

maury johnson pipeline appalachian trail

The Mountain Valley Pipeline route over Peters Mountain in West Virginia. Courtesy Maury Johnson.

Maury Johnson, an ATC member whose West Virginia farm has been bisected by the pipeline, and who helped organize the petition, said that the private, non-profit ATC should be required to disclose the agreement, because it is partially funded by public funds.

“I don’t know if this is a good agreement or a bad agreement,” he said. “Show us the agreement and let us decide if there is anything that was the sellout or not. After inspection, if it’s a good agreement, I will be the first person say this is a good agreement.”

It’s not clear whether the ATC would be required to release a private agreement to the public, since receipt of government grants does not necessarily subject organizations to public-information laws. In 2018, $2.4 million of the organization’s total income of $8.9 million, or about 26 percent, came from government grants.

In addition, Downs said the agreement includes information about potential real-estate purchases, which even governments usually are not required to reveal, since such information can affect ongoing negotiations.

If the ATC continues to refuse to release the agreement, Johnson said opponents are willing to pursue “every legal option.”

Opponents Felt Betrayed

Johnson said he felt betrayed when he was notified of the agreement “literally five minutes” before it was publicly announced.

“We were working with them, trying to create the Peters Mountain Cultural Heritage Area. At the same time, the ATC was negotiating with MVP and never said a word to us,” he said.

Mountain Valley Pipeline construction near Indian Creek in West Virginia. Photo courtesy Appalachians Against Pipelines.

Johnson acknowledged that, “by themselves, the ATC was never going to stop this pipeline.” But he said the ATC’s decision to work with MVP sets a troubling precedent. He called the promise of $19.5 million “greenwashing.”

“This means that anybody that wants to can pay a small amount of money to take shortcuts, to come in and destroy viewsheds,” he said. “It’s influence buying.”

ATC Vows to Minimize Trail Impacts

Downs said the ATC entered into the agreement to ensure the best possible outcome for the trail, regardless of what happens with the pipeline. The ATC will continue to participate in the federal permit process to minimize impacts to the AT, he said.

MVP announced Feb. 12 that it expects to complete work on the $5 billion to $6 billion project by the end of 2021, but that the pipeline will not enter service until sometime in 2022.

But opponents say MVP’s 2020 claim that the pipeline was 92 percent complete is exaggerated, noting that the company recently revised that number to 80 percent. One critic used public records to estimate that as of July, 85 percent of the project’s 303 miles had been “trenched” and 78 percent had been “backfilled,” but just 51 percent had been fully restored as required.

“This is not a done deal,” Johnson said.

He said  the “steepest, most difficult part” of the project still lies ahead. He believes MVP’s plan to bore under the AT won’t work, due to the geology of Peters Mountain.

“If that doesn’t work, I believe they are going to have to blast through the trail,” he said.

The Mountain Valley Pipeline route on Sinking Creek Mountain, Va., taken from an aerial drone. Courtesy Mountain Valley Watch via Maury Johnson.

But Johnson is encouraged that the pipeline is facing an increasingly uphill battle. He expects Congress to approve the National Scenic Trails Viewshed Protection Act, which will provide new protections for the AT — and which the ATC helped develop and continues to advocate for in Congress, Downs says. Johnson also notes that the Biden administration’s effort to rejoin the Paris climate accord will raise further obstacles for the project.

Combined with MVP’s January decision to abandon plans to use a “blanket” permit to cross at least 500 streams and wetlands — an idea twice rejected by the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals — and a host of lawsuits, those factors have convinced Johnson that the pipeline will never be finished.

“I’m confident that this is going to be stopped,” he said.

Featured image: Mountain Valley Pipeline construction near Indian Creek in West Virginia. Photo courtesy Appalachians Against Pipelines.

Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 7

  • Rick Siegfried : Feb 26th

    Absolute BULLSHIT. The ATC has become just another group of selfish money-grubbing capitalists lining their own pockets and keeping the details private. BULLSHIT because this is a public resource being destroyed by a fossil-fuel company with the help of an organization who is charged with protection that resource. Mara and the entire Board of Directors should be immediately fired and their agreement should be voided. Mara and the Board should be investigated for their part in the destruction of public lands. I would be willing to bet that Mara and the Board are tRumpsters.

  • Lamarr Eddings : Feb 28th

    No matter how loud you shout it, there’s nothing going on here that doesn’t happen all the time. The ATC got a ton of money and a tiny part of the trail will be temporarily disrupted and then it will be just another easement crossing that will be 160 feet underground. In return they will no doubt buy thousands of acres to increase the protection of the corridor. Not a bad trade for a slight alteration to an area of the Trail that you can cover in part of a day. Perspective is important.

    • Matt : Apr 29th

      Transparency is important.

  • Shawn Hill : Mar 2nd

    Failure by the ATC for complete transparency to its members and the public raises all kinds of questions which could have been easily and quickly answered by the ATC board and it’s President. Any good charity or organization that is worth it’s salt should ALWAYS by completely open and transparent with regards to their operations. The ATC completely fails my sniff test. They will never see any support from me again until this has been rectified.

  • Rocketman : Mar 6th

    Maybe it was a good deal, but the lack of transparency is very disturbing. Smells like one of Trump’s famous non-disclosure agreements.

    As to whether or not the pipeline will ever be finished, I hate all the options. Why did the government(s) ever let them start until all the permits were in place? A good part of the damage is done during installation, whether the pipeline ever transports a drop.

  • Deadpool : Apr 12th

    ATC is worried about losing trust. Well they lost mine. Unfortunately my decision to not donate this year won’t hurt the ATC because they just took $20 million from the pipeline. Maybe the ATC should adopt the policy of only accepting donations from corporations and forget about the support from hikers. I hate the argument that it was a fight that wasn’t going to be won. That is what groups like the ATC are for, to continue the fight no matter how long it takes. I asked my friend who works for the pipeline and asked why not build it through existing easements such as other pipelines or powerlines and he said it would be a pain in the ass. Cutting through land like this is much easier.

  • Joe Watts : May 11th

    That pipeline will carry the fuel of ten million trucks. Anyone who cares about the environment would support this pipeline.


What Do You Think?