To Pay or Not To Pay – Camping in the Whites
Putting it into Perspective
One of the controversies that gets discussed often among thru-hikers is the cost of camping in the Whites. All of the established campsites are managed by the Appalachian Mountain Club (AMC). Though thru-hikers often refer to it as the “Appalachian Money Collectors”.
Now, having gone through the Whites and having used some of the campsites, done work-for-stay at some of the huts, and having spent time just talking with a number of site caretakers and members of the hut “Croos” – I would like to put a little perspective on the controversy.
First off, the White Mountains are an absolute treasure. The beauty is breathtaking. They are something that everyone should be able to see and appreciate.
Second, many, many, many people do take the time to visit, hike, and appreciate them. I traversed Franconia Ridge on a Sunday and there were so many hikers up there that the trail could have used traffic lights. In fact, the Whites are potentially being “loved to death.” Only 2-3% of those appreciative hikers are AT thru-hikers and the impact of so many visitors takes a toll. The environment, especially above the tree line, can deteriorate quickly with so many visitors.
The AMC maintains a series of huts and campsite/shelters across the heart of the Whites. The huts are pretty fancy from the camping perspective, with a bunk room, a kitchen that provides breakfast and dinner, running water, and some electricity. Plus, each of the huts is staffed by a “Croo” of college-age kids who maintain the hut, cook the meals, entertain the guests, haul food up the mountain and trash down the mountain.
The huts are expensive and definitely not in the thru-hikers’ budget. Plus they are usually booked up with paying guests months in advance. Even if you wanted to pay, a thru-hike does not allow the tight scheduling required.
That said, the Croos do try to accommodate thru-hikers with work-for-stay and with leftovers. Most of us have used the huts as a source of clean, treated water and can also use their privy facilities. The challenge is that there are more thru-hikers than there are leftovers or work-for-stay slots.
The campgrounds usually consist of a shelter, tenting sites, a privy, and a water source (stream or spring). The AMC staffs these sites during the season with a caretaker that maintains the site. These sites are used by thru-hikers but also by millions of seasonal visitors who may just be out for a day or two.
The caretaker job seems to be both the best and worst summer job ever. It’s the best in that you get to spend it camping and hiking in the Whites. It’s the worst because of the maintenance duties.
Picking up the trash left daily (I have seen caretakers pulling tin cans out of the woods around their site as the Leave No Trace principles are violated by a small but significant number of visitors. Unfortunately, the impact of their actions are disproportionately felt by all.) and maintaining the section of trail around the camp are one thing. The nastiest task is maintaining the privy.
The AMC is doing everything it can to support sustainability. This includes obvious things like solar panels and wind power at the huts to minimize propane use. It also includes a system of composting privies.
The chief thing the millions of visitors bring to the Whites, and the “trace” we all leave behind is poop – tons and tons of it. In the old days of pit privies, you’d dig a hole and put the privy over it. When the hole got filled, you would dig a new hole, move the privy over it, and cover the old one with dirt. After years of nature doing its thing, the old privy hole would become more dirt-like and less poop-like. However, visitors are depositing poop at too fast a rate for this process to keep up.
So, the AMC has moved to a composting system to speed up the natural process. While this works well, it also struggles to keep up, so it requires a lot of manual labor to stir the poop, to transfer it from the privy proper to other storage/composting tanks, and to remove all the non-compostable trash that people throw in there despite the signs asking us not to.
This gets much more complicated above the tree line. There, the composting process does not work as well. As a result, poop must be shoveled out of the privies at the end of every season and helicoptered off the mountain. With the cost of operating a helicopter at over $1,000 per hour, that’s some expensive poop.
Needless to say, operating this system and maintaining the trails and the campsites costs money. Too many people visit and use the Whites to do this on a purely volunteer basis.
There are alternatives to charging for maintenance and protection of the environment, such as a permitting system, or limiting and even banning access, but each alternative also has its drawbacks. So right now the AMC charges $8 to use the campsites.
It seems logical that there should be some fee to help offset the cost. I’m not sure the $8 fee currently charged is “fair.” I’m not sure what the AMC budget and finances look like, but I do know they are non-profit and are probably not trying to get rich.
I also now appreciate why the Whites, with the huge volume of seasonal visitors, are a little different than other parts of the trail and require more maintenance to protect them.
It’s easy to complain and to attribute the fee to nefarious, money-grubbing purposes. It is easy to then violate some of the LNT rules and stealth camp above the tree line or in protected areas – justifying these actions as a righteous response to an unjust camping fee.
Just keep in mind what it takes to maintain and protect such a precious natural resource as the Whites. And make a point of thanking the caretakers that have the best and worst job in the world.
This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!
To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.
Comments 7
Thanks for this post! I just got through the Whites, and personally have nothing but good things to say about the AMC. I think a lot of thruhikers need to get off their high horse and help pay for the maintenance of such a natural treasure, just like everyone else.
Thank you for the first-hand information. I haven’t made it to the Whites yet, and you certainly put the issue’s in perspective. Thanks.
Wow, this was very informative, thanks for putting that information out there. There are many ways to support as well that don’t involve money i.e. volunteering with trail maintenance, spreading the word on Leave No Trace, leading by example etc.
FYI, The AMC does post its tax filings online: 2013 AMC Form 990 – Appalachian Mountain Club, and they ran at a net loss in 2013.
Great feedback. Thanks for doing the job nobody wants to do to secure the White Mountain’s beauty. $8 seems too low to me. Maybe thru hikers can apply to get a discount but others should be charged $25/day. The surplass of that money can be spent on paying AMC crooo better and the others to keep lobbying DC to protect the environment
As someone who has worked on Mt Rainier as a volunteer climbing ranger (Rainier also flies thousands of pounds of poop off the upper mountain), and as a operations manager for a non-profit summer program that uses composting toilets, I would say that 8 bucks a night for a campsite is really quite cheap. I think the struggle for thru-hikers is that they end up spending 8 bucks a night for 5-8 nights consecutively through the whites–which ends up being about 50 bucks. That’s a lot of meals of ramen…..Maybe increase the fee to 15 bucks a night for your average joe user, and decrease it to 5 for your hikers who are spending more than 4 nights consecutively in AMC campsites. Or something along those lines…..
good idea.