The Best Thru-Hiking Tents of 2024

Choosing a tent for your thru-hike is a big deal, but it’s also probably the least stressful house shopping experience you’ll have in your lifetime. Enjoy it. The best tents for thru-hiking strike a balance between weight, cost, durability, livable space, ease of pitch, and stability.

Your tent should also be stable in snow, breathable in areas of high humidity, and waterproof. You should be able to comfortably keep your sleeping bag away from tent walls to prevent dampness, and also get in and out easily, sit up comfortably, and have enough space (if hiking with a partner) where you don’t feel like you’re whacking them every time you move or put on a layer.

One note before we dig in: In the interest of consistency, all listed weights below represent the minimum trail weight, which includes the tent itself, rain fly (if applicable), and poles (if applicable). It does NOT include the weight of stakes, stuff sacks, or a footprint.

Quick Navigation

Best Tents for Thru-Hiking:

Best Tents for Thru-Hiking FAQs:

How to Choose a Tent for Backpacking Podcast

Best Tents for Thru-Hiking of 2024

Zpacks Duplex (Best All-Around Tent)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: Zpacks Duplex.

MSRP: $669
Weight: 18.5 ounces
Trekking-pole tent
Interior space: 28 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules
Number of stakes required: 8
Best For: Ultralight hikers who want the spaciousness of a two-person tent without the weight, or pairs of ultralight hikers.

Why We Love This Tent

“For years the Zpacks Duplex has maintained its status as one of the most popular and well-liked tents of thru-hikers — and for good reason. It stands as one of the lightest and most durable two-person trekking pole shelters available, perfectly suited for an entire summer on the trail. Single-wall DCF construction keeps the weight low without sacrificing strength or longevity, providing fully waterproof protection and a rugged bathtub floor that does not require a groundsheet.

“And despite the low weight, the Duplex is spacious enough to comfortably fit two hikers in the fully enclosed bug mesh while protecting their gear in the two vestibules. The Duplex provides full-sided protection when the weather gets nasty, and opens up on both sides for views and ventilation when the skies are clear. There will be plenty of both on a thru-hike, and the perennially awesome Duplex handles it all without weighing you down.” — Owen Eigenbrot

And it’s worth adding that the Duplex faces stiffer competition than ever before. There are a few marginally different and excellent tents that are arguably better, depending on your priorities and needs. That said, the Duplex will be an all-around winner for most backpackers.

Zpacks has also cultivated a comprehensive ecosystem of Duplex spinoffs that should satisfy almost anyone with the cash to burn. Other versions include the Duplex Zip, DupleXL, DupleXL Zip, Triplex, and Triplex Zip, not to mention a pole kit that turns the Duplex into a storm-surfing freestanding tent.


  • Mesh pockets: Two mesh interior pockets are located near each screen door and can be accessed from outside the tent as well.
  • 8-inch bathtub floor: The tall bathtub floor keeps rain out even in the soggiest campsites
  • All-in-one construction and fast pitch: Tent body and fly are one unit, with a fast (and dry) pitch using two trekking poles. Once you’ve pitched this a few times it’s easy to get it taut.
  • 48-inch peak height: Very few people will be too tall to sit up in here.
  • Rugged DCF construction: Naturally waterproof materials and taped seams mean no DWR finish or after-market seam sealing is needed.

Nobody’s Perfect

“The major criticisms of the Duplex are shared across all ultralight trekking pole shelters. As with most of these, the Duplex takes some getting used to. One must find a balance between trekking poles and guy lines, which can be challenging and changes every night… On some terrain, finding a large enough flat spot that accepts stakes can be a chore. Condensation is also a chronic issue on nights when the storm doors are closed, and the A-frame walls make it impossible to avoid brushing against this moisture. The price tag is hefty, albeit fair.” — Owen Eigenbrot

The Duplex also requires eight stakes to get adequate tension. “The large, square panel moves too much to actually use in any wind without (the extra two stakes). This large square panel is one of the major downsides of this tent.” — GPS

Best All-Around Tent Honorable Mentions:

Return to top

Big Agnes Tiger Wall UL 2  (Best Ultralight Freestanding Tent)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: Big Agnes Tiger Wall UL2 Solution-Dyed tent.

MSRP: $449.95
Weight: 35 ounces
Interior space: 28 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules (8 square feet each)
Number of stakes required: 4 – 9
Best For: Pairs of weight-conscious thru-hikers who want a fast pitch and two entrances.

Why We Love This Tent

This tent combines the best features of the Fly Creek and the Copper Spur. The Tiger Wall is a similar size to the Fly Creek, but the horizontal spreader bar allows for additional shoulder room, plus two doors and two vestibules, which make it easier to share. It’s eight ounces lighter than the Copper Spur (and cheaper, too) but has more shoulder space than the Fly Creek, plus the two doors and vestibules that pairs of hikers might prefer.

Since 2021, Big Agnes has manufactured the Tiger Wall with high-quality solution-dyed fabric that is resistant to UV fade and conserves water and energy during manufacture.

“To me, the Fly Creek was already one of the best thru-hiking tents out there, and the Tiger Wall solves all the beefs I had with that tent (more headroom, convenient side doors) while retaining the durability, compactness, and ease of use — all with a very minimal weight penalty.”—Kelly Floro

Find the Tiger Wall Platinum here, Tiger Wall UL 1 here, and Tiger Wall UL 3 here.


  • Structured corners: This means the bathtub floor has a few extra inches in the corners of vertical structure, which can give you more space to keep your sleeping bag and feet away from the tent walls
  • Dry-door entry: A few inches of space extending over the door means the interior of the tent can stay drier during setup and exits during rainy nights.
  • Interior pockets: A large ceiling pocket can hold a headlamp for some *~*ambient lighting*~* and media pockets along the side are perfect for stashing small items.
  • Color-coded buckles: Sure, you can still mess up clipping the fly to the tent body, but it’s harder to do with the color-coded buckles.

Nobody’s Perfect

The vestibules can be hard to crawl in and out of, and the rain fly can get snagged on the zipper. It is a tad smaller than the Copper Spur with less foot room, but again, it comes in eight ounces lighter. Like all freestanding tents, it’s a body-first pitch, which means your tent interior will be exposed to rain when pitching until you can get the fly up. The Platinum version of the Tiger Wall is lighter, but the price tags are traumatic. Pick your poison.

Watch our video review of the Tiger Wall here.

Best Ultralight Freestanding Tent Honorable Mentions:

Return to top

Gossamer Gear The One (Best Blend of Weight, Cost, and Function)

Best tents for thru-hiking: Gossamer Gear The One.

MSRP: $255
Weight: 17.7 ounces
Interior space: 16 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule (10 square feet)
Number of stakes required: 6 – 12
Best For: Ultralight solo hikers who value space, low cost, and low weight.

Why We Love This Tent

The One is a solo-hiker fave that tops ultralight gear roundups across the board —including our annual AT thru-hiker survey, where it frequently takes home the title for the most popular one-person tent. It’s lightweight, spacious, and affordable — even more so after Gossamer Gear recently reduced the price.

The setup is relatively simple for a trekking pole shelter, and the venting design helps prevent some of the condensation issues that arise with single-wall shelters. The top bar is wide enough to provide ample shoulder room, something that can feel lacking in solo shelters. This is a one-piece shelter that sets up with a minimum of six stakes and two trekking poles.

While we believe that there are other tents potentially more deserving of a “Best One-Person Ultralight Tent” award, the low weight and bargain price are a combination that is too good to ignore. The One makes some significant compromises, but if you want an affordable ultralight option with room to spare, it might be the one for you.


  • Side-wall tie-outs: If you want to put in the extra effort to guy out the side walls for more tension (recommended), the option is there.
  • Easy side-entry: Both doors open for max airflow.
  • Quick pitch: All trekking pole shelters (OK, all shelters in general) take some practice to get right, but this shelter is one of the less finicky trekking pole options to pitch.

Nobody’s Perfect

Some of our taller users had trouble keeping their feet away from the walls of the tent. Additionally, several participants in our annual Appalachian Trail Thru-Hiker Survey who had used the One during their thru-hikes said the tent tends to leak (and presumably also sag, since it’s silnylon) in the rain. And The One’s square-panel design will not perform as well in wind as tents with triangular panels.

Check out our reviews of Gossamer Gear’s The Two, The DCF One, and The DCF Two.

Best Blend of Weight, Cost, and Function Honorable Mention:

Return to top

Durston X-Mid 1 and X-Mid 2 (Roomiest Tent / Best Value)

MSRP: $240 1P | $280 2P
Weight: 28 oz 1P | 35.4 oz 2P
Category: Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 20 square feet 1P | 33.2 square feet 2P
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules
Number of stakes required: 4 – 8
Best For: Solo or paired hikers who want an affordable, spacious, double-wall + trekking pole setup made with the highest quality materials and methods.

Why We Love This Tent

The X-Mid was among the most popular tents in our annual thru-hiking survey and has also developed a devoted following since its days as the always-sold-out tent of mythical status. It’s easy to see why.

Both the X-Mid 1 and X-Mid 2 are reasonably lightweight, simple to pitch, and have plenty of space, including two doors and vestibules — a luxurious touch for a one-person shelter. And when we say plenty of space, we mean it. The X-Mid lineup should be a top choice for any individual or pair who value living space highly. These things are huge inside.

A laundry list of well-thought-out details makes these tents exceptional in rough weather: factory-taped seams, polyester fabric that doesn’t sag or absorb water, steep roof panels that shed snow easily, a double-wall design and large mesh storm vents that minimize condensation impacts, and the fly sets up first to keep the tent interior dry.

Designer, Dan Durston, who is perhaps the ultimate backpacking gear wonk, has thought through every aspect of the design, and you can read a thorough explanation of his thought process over on his site. And on top of it all, it’s among the cheapest tents on this list (especially considering the fact that the X-Mid comes with eight stakes and factory-taped seams).

While the X-Mid’s super-low price gets undercut by some ultra-cheap outliers, we firmly believe that you cannot find better bang for your buck anywhere else in the universe. Heck, they ain’t the lightest tents, but if you’re willing to carry the extra weight of an X-Mid, it’s the best, or nearly the best tent, across the board.

Oh wait, Durston also makes DCF versions of both X-Mids, the X-Mid Pro 1 and X-Mid Pro 2, for those afflicted with ultralight madness. Like Zpacks, Durston offers a tent for nearly every need and budget, and all of them rank near the top of their category. If you’re in the market for a trekking pole shelter, then one version of the X-Mid or another should be near the top of your list.


  • Polyester-based design: In a market dominated by silnylon and Dyneema, Durston made the semi-unusual choice to opt for silicone-coated polyester (silpoly). Why? It’s cheaper than Dyneema, and it won’t sag or absorb water like nylon. It’s also more UV-resistant than nylon. For reference, Six Moon Designs also uses silpoly in the Lunar Solo, and more tent manufacturers are expected to make the switch in coming years as its benefits become more widely recognized.
  • Fly pitches first: …and gets taken down last. That means the interior of the tent will stay dry and cozy in rainy weather.
  • Double-wall: For hikers who want the weight savings and simplicity of a trekking pole setup with the ventilation advantages of a double-wall, the X-Mid is one of just a handful of options. Large mesh vents further enhance airflow. Allows fly-only pitch.
  • Dual side doors and vestibules: Thanks to the X-Mid’s eponymous X-shaped layout, where the tent floor is oriented diagonally to that of the fly, even the single-wall version offers ample vestibules and doors on both sides.
  • Double-sewn seams: Increase the tent’s durability and speak to the overall quality and attention to detail of this design. The X-Mid is also designed to minimize the total number of seams, which improves waterproofness, durability, and weight efficiency.

Nobody’s Perfect

The one major criticism of the X-Mid is that it has a pretty large footprint (46.5 square feet under the fly for the X-Mid 1), which can make campsite selection challenging. It is also less accommodating of uneven ground than some other trekking pole tents, which can again limit suitable campsite availability.

Check out our interview with Dan Durston on Backpacker Radio.

Return to top

Zpacks Free Duo (Lightest Freestanding / Easiest Pitch)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: Zpacks Free Duo.

MSRP: $849
Weight: 30 ounces
Interior space: 26.25 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules (4.8 square feet each)
Number of stakes required: 0-8
Best For: Ultralight tenters who don’t want a fussy setup
UPDATE: The Free Duo has been discontinued and is currently unavailable. This makes us very sad, and we hope for a new version in the future.

Why We Love This Tent

“The Free Duo combines the best features of Zpacks’ DCF shelter line with the practicality of a traditional freestanding tent. It requires zero stakes to pitch (though two for the vestibules are recommended), which means it can go where trekking pole shelters can’t; bare rock, deep sand, tent platforms, a parking lot, or other stake-rejecting ground. The single-wall construction makes setup quick and easy — no fly sheet or footprint needed.

“With the help of two unique ‘H’ carbon poles, the waterproof DCF canopy pitches taut every time, which reduces wind noise and increases living space. Two vestibules provide ample storage for gear, and fully enclosed mesh keeps out the bugs even on nice nights when the storm doors are furled. Despite being both easy to use and supremely livable for two hikers, the Free Duo weighs in at under two pounds. Not only is it the lightest freestanding tent available, it’s also one of the best.” — Owen Eigenbrot

Read our review of the Free Duo here.


  • ‘H’ shaped poles: The pole structure uses two ‘H’ sections to give the tent shape. The poles are a bit unwieldy to handle solo, but minimal attachment points make setup quick.
  • Two rainbow doors: With no trekking poles in the way, the full-wall doors on either side of the tent make entry and exit easy no matter which side you’re on. Good for a quick getaway when nature calls.
  • Vestibules: The vestibules are classic Zpacks with two storm doors on each side. Close them all up for warmth or rain protection, or open them up after eating beans for dinner to improve ventilation.
  • Small footprint: With no stakes or guy lines, the Free Duo nestles well into smaller camp spots that might reject trekking pole shelters.

Nobody’s Perfect

“The big downside to the Free Duo, and all semi- or freestanding tents, is its weight. While it is extremely lightweight for that shelter type, the poles alone weigh 13 ounces. Trekking pole shelters remain the lightest option for thru-hikers willing to sacrifice ease of use for weight savings. The poles are also bulky and serve only one purpose, whereas trekking poles are useful all day and don’t add to pack weight.

“As with other single-wall tents, condensation can be an issue with the Free Duo, but the concave interior makes it easier to avoid brushing against the damp interior, and huge doors provide ample ventilation when the weather allows. Finally, the Free Duo is expensive. Arguably, it’s a fair price, but budget-conscious hikers may need to look elsewhere for their trail abode.” — Owen Eigenbrot

Lightest Freestanding / Easiest Pitch Honorable Mention:

Return to top

Zpacks Plex Solo (Lightest Fully Enclosed Tent, One-Person)

Best tents for thru-hiking: Zpacks Plex Solo.

MSRP: $599
Weight: 13.9 ounces

Category: Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 20.6 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule
Number of stakes required: 6 – 10
Best For: Ultralight tenters who want the lightest

Why We Love This Tent

For solo hikers who are looking for the lightest shelter that offers full protection from bugs and weather, this single-pole, DCF tent from Zpacks is the one. Not only is the DCF  extremely lightweight, but it’s also durable enough for an entire thru-hike while keeping a lucky hiker well-protected in even the worst conditions. Furthermore, even though the material is less compact than others, the Plex Solo is tiny when packed, and easily carried in an external backpack pocket.

While it might seem crazy to sacrifice the living space of some larger tents that only weigh a few ounces more, the small footprint helps the Plex Solo fit in even the most restricted campsites, and the single-pole setup is refreshingly easy to handle alone. The odd shape might look intimidating, but once we got the hang of it, this tent pitched in under five minutes. And speaking of living space, the Plex Solo has plenty of it for one. The oddly shaped bathtub floor includes enough room for a wide sleeping pad and gear, and the vestibule easily protects whatever is too soggy for snuggling.

Extreme ultralighters on the western trails might not need the included bug protection of the Plex Solo, and so might choose a tarp instead, but for anyone who doesn’t want to worry about questionable conditions, this tent has you covered. Easy setup, easy protection, every time.

If you are a taller hiker, the Zpacks Altaplex is essentially the same tent, but longer and taller.


  • DCF Construction: This isn’t a perfect material, but it offers a lot of benefits to hikers who can afford it. In addition to its remarkably low weight, DCF is super strong and doesn’t sag or absorb water when damp. This makes a taught pitch more achievable and drying easier.
  • Single Door and Vestibule: With only one person to accommodate, the Plex Solo has just a single door and vestibule. This makes it more difficult to create a cross-breeze on warm nights, but the wide opening still allows ample access and mega views, provided it is oriented properly. Sunrise or sunset?
  • Asymmetrical Shape: This tent is actually symmetric head to foot, but ignoring that, the footprint is a complex conglomeration of obtuse angles. However, it works. The off-center pole marks the border between the single vestibule and the floor.

Nobody’s Perfect

The complex geometry of the Plex Solo requires an inordinate number of stakes to completely tension. Six stakes will get it standing, but you’ll find a place to use up to 10, if you even own that many. Use all those stakes and the tent will be bomb-proof, but that’s a lot of fiddling.

While the peak height is quite tall, the design inevitably limits useable space up high. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone looking at a single-pole shelter, but even though the Plex Solo offers plenty of space for one, it’s better utilized while lying down. Shoulder room is tight, so prepare to go crazy if a storm keeps you inside for 12 hours straight.

Finally, DCF single-wall tents all cost a lot and suffer from condensation issues. At $599, the Plex Solo isn’t overpriced, it’s just a lot of money. Budget-conscious hikers can find a much cheaper tent, albeit heavier and less awesome.

Read our review of the Zpacks Plex Solo here.

Return to top

Durston X-Mid Pro 2 (Lightest Fully Enclosed Tent, Two-Person)

MSRP: $639-$739
Weight: 18.2 or 20.1 ounces (depending on floor choice)

Category: Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 28.8 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules
Number of stakes required: 4 – 8
Best For: Space-hungry ultralight pairs or anyone looking for the lightest.

Why We Love This Tent

The X-Mid Pro 2 just edges out the Zpacks Duplex as the lightest two-person tent on the market today, and honestly, it would be easy to see it (along with the one-person X-Mid Pro 1) as our top all-around choice instead. Sure, it’s crazy lightweight, but it also keeps the features that make the regular X-Mid such an amazing tent: the easy pitch, spacious interior, and effective ventilation, to name a few.

While the silpoly X-Mid is a wildly successful and popular tent, it was inevitable that the hiking community would demand a lighter version, and the X-Mid Pro is the result. By switching to DCF, hikers will enjoy more benefits other than significantly lightening their load. This version of the X-Mid is single-wall, meaning that there’s less fabric to manage and dry after it gets wet. Pitching is also simpler, which is a small yet appreciated difference after stacking big miles day after day. Finally, although the footprint is slightly smaller, interior space is increased. The amount of shoulder and headroom for both users is kind of embarrassing.

And because Dan Durston is always thinking, the X-Mid Pro is offered with two floor options. Those wanting the lightest version will opt for the DCF, while hikers looking for a smaller packed size and lower cost should consider the silnylon floor. It’s easy to obsess over all things DCF, but this choice brings us into Dan’s Fantastic World of Fabrics, where nothing is black and white or an easy choice. For this, and so many other reasons, one might consider the X-Mid the Thinking Hiker’s Tent.


  • Floor fabric option: DCF isn’t always the best choice, which is most apparent with tent floors. Puncture and abrasion resistance is less than that of similar-weight woven fabrics, which is why the X-Mid Pro is also offered with a 15D silnylon floor. This reduces the cost and bulk while remaining lightweight and durable.
  • Simple pitch: Unlike most other trekking pole shelters, the X-Mid will pitch with as few as four stakes. While stormy conditions will ask for a few more, it’s easy to fall in love with this simplicity after too many tents that take 6-8 just to stand upright.
  • Hot bonded seams: There are a couple ways to combine panels of DCF, and hot bonding results in a stronger, more waterproof connection than sewing and seam taping. This process costs more, but the extra durability is worth it on that stormy Day 130 of your thru-hike.
  • Patented geometry: It’s not obvious when looking at it, but the interior floor of the X-Mid is a parallelogram, not a true rectangle, which is one of the reasons that there is so much luxurious space inside. This also keeps the poles out of the main doorways and naturally creates huge vestibules.

Nobody’s Perfect

The X-Mid Pro shares some of the same criticisms of the original X-Mid. Weight is no longer one of them, but the footprint is still a little larger than some campsites can accommodate. In reality, however, reports of this are no more common than with other trekking pole shelters, which all suffer from oversized footprints.

More practically, the precise geometry that allows a simple, four-stake pitch also makes the X-Mid less adaptable to uneven ground. Setting up the X-Mid is easier when it’s easy, but can take a little more work to get perfect when it’s not.

Return to top

Big Agnes Fly Creek 1 (Best Freestanding Tent for Individuals)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: Big Agnes Fly Creek HV UL Solution- Dyed tent.

MSRP: $369.95
Weight: 27 ounces
Category: Semi-freestanding
Interior space: 20 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule (8 square feet)
Number of stakes required: 8 – 11
Best For: Solo hikers who want an ultralight tent with the convenience of tent poles

Why We Love This Tent

The Fly Creek is one of the flagship lightweight backpacking tents from Big Agnes and now comes with more headroom and a larger front entry. This well-designed tent’s pole structure offers maximum interior space for as little weight as possible, and the materials have stood the test of time on thru-hikes, with very few durability issues compared to other tents. It was a toss-up between this and the beloved Copper Spur, which is more comfortable but also heavier and more expensive.

In 2021, Big Agnes began manufacturing the Fly Creek with high-quality solution-dyed fabric that is resistant to UV fade and conserves water and energy during manufacture.

“I shared a two-person Fly Creek with my partner on an Appalachian Trail thru-hike and we both absolutely loved it. It’s durable and easy to set up. Although some people find it cramped for two, we never really minded. We were also very impressed by the tent’s stormworthiness: it stood up to high winds, driving rain, and literal floods without missing a beat. To this day, it’s never leaked, ripped, bent, or otherwise developed signs of wear despite heavy use.” —Kelly Floro


  • Single-hub pole structure: Fast pitch, easy to set up. Big Agnes uses lightweight plastic clips to attach the tent body to the poles that are easy to clip, even with frozen fingers.
  • Interior pockets: Never lose your headlamp or your phone with two interior pockets, handy for organizing smaller items.
  • Dry-brow entry: Helps keep your gear dry when it’s stashed in the vestibule.

Nobody’s Perfect

The Fly Creek has roughly the same interior space and headroom as the Copper Spur and Tiger Wall, but its door and vestibule are positioned at the front of the shelter, rather than on the side. This means you’ll have to scoot forward out of your sleeping bag and do tent yoga to get in and out in the middle of the night. While we like the idea of the dry-brow entry, it does make it slightly more physically challenging to crawl in and out of the tent. Finally, the Fly Creek takes a lot of stakes — eight minimum if you have the fly on — which reduces its UL luster somewhat.

“Although I love this tent, I eventually upgraded to a Tiger Wall because of the increased headroom and side doors. The front door is really difficult to use, especially if you’re trying not to accidentally squash your partner’s face in the dark. This also renders the tiny vestibule virtually useless.”—Kelly Floro

Read our review of the Fly Creek HV UL2 here.

Best Freestanding Tent for Individuals Honorable Mentions:

Return to top

3F UL Lanshan 1 Pro (Best Budget UL Tent)

Best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: 3F UL Lanshan 1 Pro.

MSRP: $169-$179
Weight: 26 ounces
Category: Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 24.7 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule
Number of stakes required: 6 – 9
Best For: Ultralight tenters on a budget

Why We Love This Tent

At well under $200, the Lanshan 1 Pro is the most affordable tent on this list while remaining truly ultralight at 26 ounces for the tent, guyline, and stuff sack. The Lanshan is made of silylon with all guyout points reinforced by UHMWPE-gridstop.

Where this tent shines, besides the price, is in versatility. Most thru-hikers will be OK with the standard three-season version of this tent, but there’s also a four-season version of the Lanshan for winter adventurers. Likewise, taller hikers can upgrade to the plus-size version, and stargazers who don’t mind a little extra weight can opt for the double-wall Lanshan 1. Unlike many UL manufacturers, 3F UL ships all over the world, a boon for international hikers.


  • Single or double wall:  The Lanshan Pro is lightest as a single-wall tent with a roof vent to reduce condensation. But if you prefer the ventilation and stargaze-ability of two walls, the Lanshan 1 is your best bet. You decide.
  • Reinforced guyouts: All guyout points are reinforced with UHMWPE-gridstop to prevent tears.
  • Fully integrated bathtub floor: The 4.3-inch-high bathtub floor is sewn to the main tent body with a band of no-see-um mesh.

Nobody’s Perfect

The Lanshan doesn’t come seam-sealed; you can do it yourself or pay $35 to have 3F UL do it. The tent body is also made of silnylon at a time when many manufacturers are switching to silpoly, which doesn’t sag and stretch when wet the way silnylon does. 3F UL is headquartered in China, which may be a downside for US consumers who aim to shop closer to home. Finally, the bathtub floor is only 4.3 inches high, which is…not much. For comparison, the Lunar Solo’s bathtub is six inches deep. You’ll be vulnerable to splashback in this shallow tent.

Best Budget UL Tent Honorable Mentions:

Return to top

MSR Hubba Hubba 2 (Best Tent for Rough Weather)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: MSR Hubba Hubba 2

MSRP: $549.95
Weight: 46 ounces
Interior space: 29 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules
Number of stakes required: 2-8
Best For: Pairs of hikers who want more space/durability/a true freestanding tent.

Why We Love This Tent

The MSR Hubba Hubba 2 got a major facelift recently. The new model is a whole ten ounces lighter than its predecessor, and it accomplished this without sacrificing any of the interior space. Thanks to the way the shoulder space and poles are set up, it can be more comfortable for taller hikers or pairs of hikers who want to split the weight for the luxury of some extra space. The true (non-tapered) rectangular floor and 40 inches of headroom make this tent truly spacious.

The fly and tent body materials are heftier than other models of a similar size, but the tradeoff is increased durability and less chance of the fly getting caught in the zipper. The poles are thicker than lighter-weight tents, so you can be a little rougher with this tent. The fly pitch is taut, but what really sells us is the design for maximizing head, shoulder, and foot space as well as the burlier materials for durability.

Find the MSR Hubba 1 here.


  • Stable, durable poles: It will take a lot to make this tent collapse. Poles are Easton Syclone, which are ultra-rugged and can stand up to some serious wind. The poles reach all four corners of this true freestanding tent, which improves wind stability as well.
  • Proprietary waterproofing: Nothing will prevent condensation in extreme conditions, but the DuraShield waterproofing and taped seams keep it dry from outside precipitation. The vestibule doors feature StayDry rain gutters to keep you and your gear dry, and kickstand vents maximize airflow.
  • Livable space: Mentioned above, but the design — from head(space) to toe(space) has livability in mind.

Nobody’s Perfect

The tent does have a smart design, but it’s still 29 square feet of interior space for nearly three pounds, which is a bit more than other semi-freestanding tents. You’re trading weight savings for durability. Depending on what type of hiker you are, this could be worth it. It’s also worth noting that the tent body has more solid (non-mesh) panels, which is great during storms but means fewer opportunities for stargazing on fair nights.

Read our review of the MSR Hubba Hubba 2 here.

Return to top

Nemo Hornet Osmo 2 (Smallest Two-Person Tent Footprint)

MSRP: $430
Weight: 33 ounces
Interior space: 27.5 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules (7 square feet each)
Number of stakes required: 5 – 10
Best For: Hikers who don’t need a ton of space and want a narrower tent footprint for pitching in tight spots

Why We Love This Tent

The Hornet has a versatile footprint and can fit into tighter spaces than some of the broader pitches. This is technically a semi-freestanding tent (like the Tiger Wall) as opposed to having all corners of the tent set up with poles. You’ll have to stake out the footbox for a full pitch. The design is overall similar to the BA Tiger Wall, but the Hornet uses special proprietary fabrics and shaves a couple of ounces thanks to its cut-out fly design.

NEMO maximizes headroom with their proprietary “Flybar” pole clip, which takes the place of the spreader bars of other tents. This helps keep the angle of the tent walls away from the shoulders, allowing for more sitting room and space to change without touching the sides of the tent.

The Hornet was updated in 2023 with Nemo’s proprietary Osmo fabric, a ripstop nylon and polyester composite that’s purported to be more water-resistant and less likely to sag when wet. Unlike many waterproof materials, Osmo contains no harmful PFOAs (sometimes called forever chemicals because of how slow they are to break down).

If you really want to save weight, the Nemo Hornet Elite Osmo weighs six ounces less, costs $650, and has the same interior space.


  • Osmo fabric: Nemo claims it’s more water-repellent and less likely to sag when wet than prior versions of the tent.
  • Single-hubbed pole system: Easy setup and pitch, lightweight poles are just one piece and have three anchor points—two at the head, one at the foot.
  • Flybar pole clip: Instead of a horizontal spreader bar, this tent comes with an extended pole clip to add headroom.
  • Two side-entry doors: Can be considered a must-have for two-person tents.

Nobody’s Perfect

“This is one of the smaller two-person semi-freestanding tents on this list. The Hornet is lightweight and stable, but it does have less interior and vestibule space than the comparable BA Tiger Wall (which many users already consider cramped) and will feel tight with two people after extended use.” Maggie Slepian

Some users also complain that the cut-out fly leaves the head and foot ends of the tent vulnerable to backsplash during heavy rain.

Return to top

Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo (Best One-Pole Setup)

Best tents for thru-hiking: Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo.

MSRP: $260
Weight: 26 ounces
Category: Trekking-pole tent
Interior space: 26 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule (8.5 square feet)
Number of stakes required: 6 – 8
Best For: Ultralight solo hikers looking for a low-maintenance, durable shelter with a fast-pitch

Why We Love This Tent

“$260 is cheap for a backpacking tent. And yet the quality of the Lunar Solo feels anything but. This tent is optimized for maximum ventilation: plenty of mesh throughout the structure and a gap between the fly and the ground promote airflow. It only requires one trekking pole to set up and has a generous 49 inches of headroom at the peak. The steeply angled pitch of this tent helps it to shed snow effectively, making it feel surprisingly stable for a structure that’s only propped up by one pole. SMD updated the design at the end of last year to include corner cord guyouts for easy tension adjustment.” — Kelly Floro


  • Center pole pitch: This increases the stability of the tent in high winds and allows it to shed water more easily
  • (Almost) entirely mesh side wall: Ounce-saving mesh increases breathability from the bathtub floor to the peak (an additional 360˚ mesh strip just above the bathtub adds to the tent’s breezy appeal.
  • 6-inch floating bathtub floor: 40D silicone-coated polyester and the tent’s floating floor design maximize puncture resistance
  • Internal mesh storage pocket: You know the drill. Organize your small items for easy nighttime access.

Nobody’s Perfect

The steep walls of this shelter and single-pole setup mean less shoulder room and more wind resistance. Users will need to seal the seams themselves or pay $35 for Six Moon Designs to seal the tent for $35 before shipping if you don’t want to do it yourself. Stakes aren’t included, so if you don’t have some already, you’ll need to factor that into the purchase price as well.

Read our review of the Lunar Solo here.

Best One-Pole Setup Honorable Mention:

Return to top

TarpTent Protrail Li (Roomiest Vestibule)

best tents thru-hiking

Best tents for thru-hiking: Tarptent Protrail Li. Image via Tarptent.

MSRP: $529+
Weight: 16 ounces
Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 21 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 1 door, 1 vestibule (11.2 square feet)
Number of stakes required: 4 – 8
Best For: Ounce-counting solo hikers

Why We Love This Tent

The traditional and ever-popular silpoly Protrail got a DCF update in 2020, shaving nine ounces. This A-frame shelter has a front entrance and a generous overhang to prevent items in the gargantuan vestibule from getting wet. This is a single-piece shelter with an integrated fly and tent body, making a fast pitch once you get the hang of it. It has a 45-inch peak height at the front of the tent, with a steep pitch on the sides and down toward the back.

You will need two trekking poles for this setup, with the tallest one at the front entry, and just four stakes. We recommend pitching the front pole at an angle to make entry/exit easier. It has a ring of 360-degree mesh and a rear mesh window for increased airflow and views. The rugged floating bathtub means you theoretically don’t need a groundcloth with the Protrail Li, sparing you from further weight and setup difficulty.

Check out the heavier-but-50-percent-cheaper silpoly Protrail here.


  • Reinforced pole caps: A lot of pressure is put on the hubs for trekking poles. These are reinforced for extended durability
  • Large vestibule: The vestibule or “beak” area is 11 square feet, plenty big for gear organization and maneuvering
  • Fast pitch: Like all trekking-pole shelters, it takes a few tries to dial in the system, but once you have it, the pitch is fast, especially since you only need to pound four stakes in the process.
  • Smart ventilation design: It’s a constant battle to combat condensation in shelters like this, but storm flaps can be opened and rolled up to allow maximum airflow.
  • Bathtub floor: The floating bathtub floor is rugged and tall enough to protect from splashing rain.

Nobody’s Perfect

It takes two trekking poles to set up compared to just one for the comparable SMD Lunar Solo. Also, there’s a lot of wide, flat surface area in this design that increases wind resistance: pitch with the foot end facing into the wind to mitigate this.

Return to top

LightHeart Gear SoLong (Best Tent for Tall People)

Best tents for thru-hiking: LightHeart Gear SoLong. Photo: Lightheart Gear.

MSRP: $325
Weight: 32 ounces
Category: Trekking pole tent
Interior space: 30 square feet
Doors / Vestibules: 2 doors, 2 vestibules
Number of stakes required: 6
Best For: Tall UL hikers

Why We Love This Tent

The floor of the SoLong is 100 inches long. LightHeart says it’s SO LONG that hikers taller than six-foot-eight will still sleep comfortably in it.  While best as a solo tent for tall folks, two “regular-size” individuals could use it comfortably as well. We love that the Solong has an awning vestibule on one side: perfect if you want a little more airflow or to lay in bed and look outside while still having some overhead protection. The tent likewise has two generous peak vents to cut down on condensation. We love LightHeart in general as a small, North Carolina-based, woman- and veteran-owned company.


  • Eight-inch bathtub floor: Much taller than average, great for preventing splashback.
  • Awning fly: One of the vestibules can be propped up with a carbon fiber pole to create an awning.
  • Lateral ridge pole: Creates more headroom and lateral stability during windstorms.
  • Linelocs: For easy precision tensioning of all guyouts.
  • 30D ripstop silnylon: Both fly and bathtub floor.
  • Double-stitched seams:  For added durability.

Nobody’s Perfect

The awning requires a carbon fiber pole to set up, which is sold separately and not factored into the base weight or price of the tent. I suppose you could also use a short trekking pole to set it up if you have a third one handy (the tent itself requires two). Not necessarily a true con, but it’s worth noting that while the SoLong is extra long, it’s not extra tall: the peak is 45 inches tall, which is about typical for a backpacking tent.

Best Tent for Tall People Honorable Mention:

Return to top

The Best Tents for Thru-Hiking for Thru-Hikers: FAQs

What’s the difference between freestanding and trekking pole tents?

The Zpacks Duplex is a classic example of a trekking pole shelter. Photo courtesy Owen Eigenbrot.

Traditional tents have dedicated poles to give the shelter structure and body. These tents will hold their shape without the need for stakes, so they’re referred to as freestanding. (Note: even for freestanding tents, one or two stakes are typically required for the vestibule(s), and the use of additional stakes will improve your tent’s stormworthiness). The MSR Hubba Hubba is a good example of a true freestanding tent. These shelters are simple to pitch, but the poles add both weight and bulk and are always at risk of bending or snapping.

Trekking pole tents are instead supported, obviously, by the user’s trekking poles. These tents are non-freestanding because they require stakes to hold their shape. The Zpacks Duplex is a good example. Trekking pole tents are much harder to set up than their freestanding brethren, but by ditching the tent poles, you’ll save a massive amount of weight and space in your pack. If you’re camping on bedrock, snow, or another medium that won’t readily take stakes, you’re in trouble. Deadman anchors, large rocks, tree trunks, and other objects can be used in place of stakes in a pinch.

Some tents, like the Big Agnes Tiger Wall, are semi-freestanding: they have dedicated poles that mostly support the tent, but they require stakes to give the footbox structure. This hybrid approach helps shave some ounces by simplifying the tent pole architecture while retaining the easy setup advantage of true freestanding tents.

The Zpacks Free Duo is a rare example of a single-wall, DCF, freestanding tent. Photo courtesy Owen Eigenbrot.

Return to top

Should I go with a two-person tent or a one-person tent?

It’s largely a matter of personal preference, but we will point out that according to our thru-hiker survey, two-person tents are far more popular than their one-person counterparts (even among solo hikers). Most 1p shelters take that designation literally: they’re just wide enough to accommodate a regular-sized human laying on their back with a few inches of space on either side, and that’s it. This makes the tent as light as possible, of course, but can undoubtedly feel cramped to some hikers.

Since your tent will be your home for several months on the trail, many solo thru-hikers choose to upgrade to a 2p tent so they can have a bit more room to spread out. The larger version of the tent usually weighs a few ounces more and is more expensive, but the tradeoff is worth it for many hikers. Similarly, couples often go with a 3p tent.

Return to top

What’s the difference between single-wall and double-wall tents?

Single-wall tents, like the Zpacks Duplex, shave weight by eliminating the separate bug mesh. Single-wall designs are lighter and faster to set up once you get the hang of it. There’s no separate rainfly to fuss with because the whole tent is waterproof: the rainfly is the tent. This also makes it way easier and drier to set up and take down camp in wet weather. On the other hand, they’re often poorly ventilated compared to their double-wall friends (though some single-walls do better than others). Condensation is one of the biggest issues with these shelters, though good campsite selection can help to mitigate this.

READ NEXT —  9 Tips To Help You Find a Perfect Campsite Every Time

Most single-walled tents are also trekking pole setups, while most double-walled designs are freestanding, but this isn’t set in stone. Double-wall trekking pole shelters like the Durston X-Mid and the Six Moon Designs Haven Tarp + NetTent combo do exist. As do single-wall freestanding tents like the Zpacks Free Duo. Which style/combination of styles makes for the best thru-hiking tents? It’s largely a matter of personal preference.

Return to top

What features should I look for in the best thru-hiking tents?

The Big Agnes Tiger Wall has a good blend of space and weight savings, plus it has an idiot-proof pitch. Photo via Maggie Slepian.

Livable Space: A one-person tent is fine for people counting ounces, but some hikers will appreciate a lightweight two-person tent for just themselves. It will allow you to spread out, stay away from the tent walls, and keep your gear inside the tent with you. For two people on a thru-hike, some two-person models will work fine, but often pairs of hikers end up getting larger models after a few hundred miles of bumping into each other when sitting up or changing. Consider interior space, vestibule space, and peak height.

General Conveniences: Consider that this is your home for months at a time. What features do you want in your portable house? Two doors and two vestibules for multi-person tents will alleviate any crawling over each other during midnight cathole excursions, and interior side pockets are nice for small items. The best tents for thru-hiking strike a fine balance between functionality and weight.

Ease of Pitch: Test your setup before you leave. The last thing you want to be doing after an excruciating day on trail is fighting with your guylines to get the fly taut before the rain comes in. Or pitching your tent in the mud just to have it collapse on you a few hours later.

Weight-to-Space Ratio: Sure you have 31 square feet of space, but your tent also weighs six pounds. Is this worth it? It might be, and that’s OK. On the other hand, you could prefer a 14-ounce, single-person trekking pole shelter and forgo the headroom. That’s fine too. More than likely you’ll wind up somewhere in the middle—many of the listed shelters have 27-29 square feet of interior space and weigh 2.5-3.5 pounds.

Return to top

What’s the difference between “packaged weight” and “trail weight?”

The packaged weight is the weight of the tent plus everything that comes with it, including instructions, repair kits, stuff sacks, extra stakes, extra guyline… you get the picture.

In contrast, the trail weight (or minimum trail weight) is the combined weight of the tent body, rainfly, and poles (if applicable). It does not include the weight of the stakes, footprint, or any extra guyline you might choose to carry.

As you can see, both numbers give an incomplete idea of the weight of your tent. This true weight will likely be somewhere in between the packaged and trail weights. Some cottage brands, like Zpacks and Gossamer Gear, will give you an itemized breakdown of the individual weights of each tent component down to the smallest stuff sack, adding much-needed clarity to the tent-buying experience.

Return to top

Do I really need a footprint with my tent?

In general, yes. The footprint, or ground cloth, will prolong the life of your tent by protecting the floor from moisture and abrasive, puncture-making stuff like rocks, sand, and twigs. Annoyingly, most tent purchases don’t include the footprint: after shelling out hundreds of dollars for the tent, you then have to fork over an additional $50 or $60 (plus several ounces of base weight) for the ground cloth. Meh.

As an alternative, you can make or buy an inexpensive, lightweight Tyvek or Polycro ground cloth. Some tents, like the Tarptent Protrail, have rugged, puncture-resistant bathtub floors and don’t require a separate footprint.

The Lunar Solo doesn’t require a separate footprint (though it’s probably still a good idea on abrasive media like sand).

Return to top

What’s the difference between silnylon, silpoly, and DCF?

Silnylon: Most traditional tents are made of silicone-coated ripstop nylon, or silnylon. Silnylon is popular because it’s inexpensive, waterproof, reasonably puncture-resistant, reasonably lightweight, and packs up small. It has a tendency to stretch out and sag when wet, making it tough to get a taut pitch. UV exposure also weakens it quickly.

Silnylon is available in different weights, which are measured in units of deniers (d). The larger the number, the tougher (and heavier) the material. The ultralight Big Agnes Tiger Wall uses thin 15d silnylon, the SMD Lunar Solo uses 20D, and the burlier MSR Hubba Hubba uses 30d. A ripstop nylon backpack, in contrast, might use 500d silnylon.

Silpoly: Silicone-coated polyester isn’t as strong as silnylon when new, but a growing school of thought says silpoly’s superior UV-resistance makes it more durable in the long run. It also won’t sag when wet the way silnylon does. Silpoly is growing more and more common in the UL tent world as the fabric technology continues to improve: Six Moon Designs and Durston Gear have both embraced it over silnylon, and Henry Shires is in the process of changing several silnylon TarpTent designs back to silpoly.

DCF: DCF (Dyneema Composite Fabric) is the cutting edge of ultralight fabrics. Originally designed for use in sailboats, DCF is an extremely lightweight and strong nonwoven/laminated fabric and the darling of the cottage gear trade. It’s completely waterproof and resistant to both tears and stretching, though it can still be punctured fairly easily. It’s easy to repair with a simple patch job, though. It also won’t sag or absorb water when wet.

The DCF One is Gossamer Gear’s update on the original silnylon version of The One. Photo courtesy Carl Stanfield.

Return to top

Do I need to seam seal my tent?

Depends on the brand. Most big brand tents—Big Agnes, REI, etc.—have factory-taped seams and don’t require initial seam sealing. The factory treatment can wear out after extensive use, so you’ll eventually have to reseal them. Some cottage industry tents, like the Six Moon Designs Lunar Solo, don’t come seam-sealed to keep the price lower. You can pay a little extra for seam sealing service or save money and do it yourself.

Fortunately, seam sealer is widely available at camping and hardware stores and is easy to use. Just set up your tent (in a dry, non-dusty, non-windy place), ensure that the seams are clean and dry, and paint seam sealer over all seams that don’t adjoin mesh paneling. Leave the tent set up for several hours until the sealant has dried completely.

Return to top

Why should you trust us?

Because we’re so incredibly intelligent, of course! Attractive, too. (Not to mention extremely humble).

But if that isn’t enough to impress you, there’s also the fact that everyone who contributed to this article is an experienced thru-hiker with thousands of on-trail miles under their belt. We’re gear nerds who love putting our equipment to the test on trails long and short, and we’ve tested dozens of tents in pursuit of a better night’s sleep in the backcountry.

Moreover, we survey hundreds of Appalachian Trail thru-hikers every year to learn about their behaviors, demographics, and—you guessed it—gear preferences. That means our picks for the best thru-hiking tents aren’t just our opinions: they’re based on years of feedback from the thru-hiking community.

Check out AT hikers’ picks for the best thru-hiking tents from the 2018, 2019, 2021, and 2022 thru-hiker surveys.

Competence and backpacking proficiency personified.

Original article by Maggie Slepian. Alex “GPS” Brown and Rachel Shoemaker contributed to the 2023 update of this list. Owen Eigenbrot updated for 2024.

Featured image: Graphic design by Chris Helm (@chris.helm).

Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 52

  • pearwood : Feb 11th

    What a wealth of options, especially if one is wealthy.

    I’m reminded of advice I received over four decades ago, “Once you make your decision and purchase your tent, put away the catalogs for six months because as soon as you buy a tent, someone will come along with a better one for less money.”

    Steve / pearwood

    • Boomerang : Feb 12th

      Big Agnes Scout UL2 beats all of these.

    • LBJJ : Feb 12th

      Put away the catalogues for 3-5 years, lest you’re haunted by buyer’s remorse!

    • Julianne Smith : Jan 14th

      IKR?! I went with a 1 person tent on clearance wit weighs over 4 pounds! Not what I would go with if making the purchase today. But it saves me money and I have emotional attachment to it now.
      It’s a good starter.

  • Pete Schiller : Feb 11th

    Tarptent Li series tents do not need to be seam-sealed.

    • Julianne Smith : Jan 14th

      I looked at that one but was confused if it’s a tent or just rain cover. Is it fully enclosed so a mouse couldn’t crawl in?

      • Tori0955 : May 30th

        This is the real question because I’m only half joking when I say I’d rather deal with a bear than a rat. Bear spray may work a loud whistle may work but mice have zero cares in the world to give. They will just stand in your tent and watch you blow your whistle. I don’t know why, but I am irrationally afraid of them.

  • Todd : Feb 12th

    I can’t believe that you left out the Dan Durston X-Mid 2p from that list. It blows the doors off all of these tents for the weight to cost to feature ratio. Please take a look at it. We even did a video on it on our youtube channel, as have many others.

    • Alex : Feb 12th

      +1, this is a solid list but I was quite surprised by the complete absence of the X-Mid 1p or 2p given it’s weight/cost/feature profile and popularity among owners.

      • DismalDave : Feb 16th

        Yeah Baby
        Love my Durston 1P and wish I had the 2P instead of the $400 2P I have. Just got the 2P earlier.
        I started through the list and thought Wait a second, somethings missing here!

      • Dan Durston : Feb 18th

        The X-Mid 1P did make the list. Maybe they added it later or something?

    • Jennifer Jacobs : Feb 18th

      Yes I have this tent too but never see any one use it but people buy them like no tomorrow.. Its easy to set up and requires less stakes to set up then most tents out there.. They have the one 1p on here because its 28oz but the other one is 38 oz with stakes … Most hikers take t poles any way ….Yes finding spot to put it but you get room to put all your stuff out and cook on other side and put junk on other ..

  • Nancy : Feb 12th

    My husband and I have used a Hyperlite UltaMid 4 for about 5 years now on Vermont’s Long Trail and about half of the AT. I don’t see any tents here that I would prefer to the Hyperlite. It beats all of them in every category, except for price. Which we didn’t mind, since it is a lifetime purchase.
    Bonus: Made in Biddeford Maine!
    I can’t say enough good about Hyperlite’s packs either. I bought a 2400 Southwest in 2013. I use it for everything, 2 week backpack trips, dayhikes, long ski tours, and it is still going strong. I saw xc skiers training for the Canadian Ski Marathon in the Gatineau using this pack!

  • Antoine : Feb 12th

    You seem to have gotten mixed up between the ProTrail and ProTrail Li. The Li line with Tarptent are DCF so they need to be seam-sealed and it won’t sag overnight for the same reason. Also as far as weight goes, it’s pretty similar to other solo tent when you don’t include the stakes in its weight.

    • Darrell Barrett : Mar 26th

      The li, DCF line from TarpTent doesn’t need to be seam sealed. You have it backwards.

  • LBJ : Feb 12th

    Much is made of the condensation issues on single-wall tents. In my experience with double-wall tents, the inner almost always has substantial mesh on the roof. When condensation forms on the inside of the rain fly (which it does just like a single wall tent), the slightest movement of the fly sends condensation raining down onto the mesh and hence all over the contents of your tent. Having used both extensively, I see very little difference in the performance of single and double wall tents with regard to condensation management (the one exception being the “physically touching the tent wall” scenario). If you really want to manage condensation, try picking campsites with a breeze (and open your vestibule to allow the breeze to sweep your tent) and avoid valley bottoms where cold air settles – not always possible of course, and in stormy weather all bets are off, but there’s no miraculous difference between single and double wall tents for avoiding condensation.

    • d20 : Jan 10th

      Your comment is exactly what I learned over time.

      Once I understood that it was easier to switch to a single wall tent and to keep it condensation free on the Appalachian Trail.

  • Supriya : Feb 24th

    Great detailed information! I’m upgrading to Tigerwall UL2 to get me into both, solo or hiking with my partner.
    But also curious to know abt Slingfin tents review. Though they are smaller company, they’ve great tents but not very popular.

    • Blis : Mar 11th

      I wish they did a sub category for best UL tents for tall people. I’ve found listed dimensions differ than actual usable inside dimensions on some tents.

      • Bart : Jan 13th

        My friend is 6’4″. He uses the Zpacks Triplex and sleeps diagonally. Says it’s perfect.

    • Peter R. : Jan 7th

      All great options, but I have my eye on the SlingFin Portal. Overkill for many, but I love winter backpacking and the storm-worthiness of the Portal is something I really value! Hoping for an early February ’23 or ’24 AT NOBO hike, all of these tents would be great (love my Lunar Solo!) but SlingFin is a nifty company!

  • Stephen : Apr 27th

    I find that a true 1p tent needs about 19-20 square feet and a true 2p really needs about 30 to work for most people for more than a week or two at a time.

    I’ve made do with less (my wife and I put about 1200 miles on our Copper Spur), especially with vertical sides which make the interior feel bigger, but the extra space is huge in making a tent livable.

    I’ve really noticed that since moving to a Triplex life has really been better when we tent.

    I see a similar dynamic with the Durston cult members. That is a 32 square foot 2p tent. People using it are often just much happier.

    I realize that some do ok with less space. There is that group of couples who hike while sharing a 1p tent. However, for us, for a 5’5” and 5’8” couple, I’ve found that 27-28 square feet is too little for long term use on a trail.

    It was great for short trips, but for month after month it started to feel cramped.

    37 square feet is grand, especially in the rain and keeping your gear inside the tent instead of the vestibule. And it is in line with what twice a 1p interior adds up to.

    The difference the extra space makes is subtle, but 20-30 days into a backpacking trip you will find yourself more likely to look forward to alternatives to your tent every night if it is “too small.”

    And I suspect how much rain you are getting makes a difference as well as to what is “too small.”

    With more space I’m suddenly much more willing to use the tent instead of a shelter or looking for a hostel as we finish the AT.

    Thought I’d bring that up. Curious what you think the right space numbers are and what factors into it.

  • Andrew : Jan 8th

    Any chance you could put the international weights please against these tents (like 1025 grams in brackets – to save us googling every one). 2 pounds 4 ounces is complete gibberish to most people 🙁

  • Robert : Jan 10th

    What about LightHeart Gear? For tall people, they are the best.

  • d20 : Oct 22nd

    This year on the PCT I saw a lot of Altaplex style tents on the trail. I was surprised at the inroads that tent has made but it seems like it is lighter and roomy enough for one.

    I also saw a fair number of li Tarptents.

    I’m really curious to see what 2023 brings.

  • Bart : Jan 13th

    The best freestanding tent I’ve found is a Zpacks Duplex with the additional Free Standing Flex Kit.
    The combination just gives you so many OPTIONS.
    If you just want to use the trekking poles only, that’s fine.
    If you just want to use the Free Standing Flex poles only, that’s fine. I could set up the Duplex in a parking lot if I wanted to. Many times I wouldn’t even use stakes.
    If you use BOTH the trekking poles and the Free Standing Flex pole in combination…the tent is virtually indestructible against wind.
    On the CDT the wind is SUPER strong in places. The combo of trekking poles AND free standing poles stood up to the wind with no problem. Winds at times were sustained at around 40-50mph. ANY tent is going to be a bear to set up in such winds, but once the Duplex was up, and all the lines were well secured…perfect.

  • Scott : Apr 19th

    for Colorado bikepacking I’ve narrowed my choice down to 2 options – Six Moons Design Lunar Solo and Durston’s X-Mid 1. leaning towards the X-Mid (it’s in stock!) but can anyone make a strong case for the Lunar Solo?

  • John Kriz : Dec 5th

    Great article and portfolio of tent options. I’ll be switching it up between the X-Mid 2 Pro and the HMG Mid 1.

  • Doug Johnson : Dec 13th

    You should check out the Tarptent Dipole li tents- these tents are innovative with a huge interior for a ul tent, with great airflow and views, and solid wind stability. My Dipole 2 li is my favorite tent.

  • DismalDave : Dec 20th

    I have a Durston 1P. For winter camping I unclip the inner and only use the outer tent. I put down a tarp to sleep on. Super easy to set up. I added longer cords for the corners so I could use deadmans.

    Used polypro as the ground cover on snow once. I swear that stuff has a negative coefficient of friction on snow (at least zero). Pretty sure every time I turned over I proved the right-hand rule.

  • Blacklight : Jan 24th

    Disappointed I don’t see the tarp tent notch in this list. After more than 15k miles (ECT, PCT, CDT, and AT 2 more times) the notch is the best tent I’ve owned- and it weighs the same as the duplex but is double walled. I’ve seen all of the tents listed saggy and or failed when the notch can be pitched tight and withstand anything you can throw at it.


What Do You Think?