The Best Trail Runners for Thru-Hiking in 2024
Are you planning a long-distance backpacking trip? If so, it’s essential that you choose the best trail runners for thru-hiking (if trail runners are your jam*). Think of this as an investment in your future happiness. Your feet are your most important asset as a thru-hiker, after all. You’re counting on them to carry you thousands of miles through thick and thin.
If you treat them right, it’s possible to complete an entire thru-hike without so much as a blister. But if you don’t take care of them, any number of (progressively more horrifying) foot afflictions could take you out of action in a heartbeat. That’s why it’s so important to choose proper footwear for your hike.
Shoes are highly personal — more so than most gear — because everyone’s foot shape, gait, and preferences are unique. You’ll only figure out what’s right for you through trial and error, but it helps to know a bit about the fit and features of some top models in advance.
*Boots and hiking shoes also exist. We cover the latter in this separate roundup.
Best Trail Runners for Thru-Hiking: Quick Navigation
- Altra Lone Peak (Most Popular Trail Runner with Thru-Hikers)
- Brooks Cascadia (Best Trail Runner For Narrow Feet)
- Hoka ONE ONE Speedgoat (Most Comfortable Trail Runner)
- Astral Designs TR1 Mesh (Best Shoe for Wet Trails)
- Topo Terraventure 4 (Most Versatile Trail Runner)
- Altra Olympus (Best Maximum Cushion, Roomy Toebox Trail Runner)
- Hoka ONE ONE Challenger (Best Medium Cushion Trail Runner)
- Inov-8 Trailfly Ultra G 270 V2 (Most Durable Trail Runner)
- La Sportiva Mutant (Best for Off-Trail Hiking)
- Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 (Best High Drop Trail Runner)
Best Trail Runner FAQs
- Trail runners or boots for thru-hiking?
- Hiking footwear terminology
- Are minimalist/zero-drop trail runners worth it?
- After-market insoles
- Blister prevention
The 9 Best Trail Runners for Thru-Hiking
Pros: Widest toe box around; iconic among thru-hikers; gaiter-compatible; lightweight; available in wide.
Cons: Not the grippiest; other brands offer more durable uppers; annual updates are hard to keep up with.
Lone Peaks are easily the most popular shoe model among thru-hikers: almost a third of respondents in our annual Appalachian Trail Thru-Hiker Survey reported using Lone Peaks, which are known for their minimalist, zero drop design and their wide toe box. (Incidentally, we’ve tested a lot of trail runners that claim to have a wide toe box, but none have ever seemed quite as roomy as this iconic shoe.)
The latest version has been redesigned with a durable, seamless, stitch-less upper, though an updated version might soon alter things further. The shoes continue to feature Altra’s proprietary EGO midsoles and MaxTrac outsoles.
Classic Lone Peak features like the Gaiter Traps and wide FootShape toe box are also around to stay, and the distinctive tread pattern on the bottom of the shoe remains the same. The Lone Peak is available in wide sizes.
While major changes are possible in the future, more likely is that these shoes continue to adapt gradually. While small changes may seem minor, even the slightest tweaks can trash the feet of the most loyal customer, so don’t take your favorite generation for granted. That said, Lone Peaks have remained insanely popular among thru-hikers throughout the ups and downs of their many incarnations, and we expect that trend to continue.
Pros: Gaiter-compatible; sticky outsole for added grip; lightweight; soft and adaptable midsole.
Cons: Stiff; higher drop isn’t for everyone; narrow cut will feel cramped for some.
In a world of wide toe boxes, Brooks keeps it old-school with their slim and snug-fitting Cascadias. Although some may object to the closeness of this design, it’s ideal for slenderfoots who can’t seem to avoid slipping and sliding in more generously proportioned shoes. “I rate the grip above average and durability looks great,” said contributor Owen Eigenbrot of the Cascadia 15s (2021’s model). “The new upper material is breezy and dries quickly.”
Last year’s version of the Cascadia (16) was streamlined to bring the total weight down by nearly a quarter pound, and the 17 keeps it this way, making the Cascadias one of the lightest shoes on our list. The mid and outsole have both been redesigned to make the shoe more flexible and adaptable on rough trails. The new midsole is also lighter and softer than previous versions.
Meanwhile, the updated rock plate provides ample protection from rough, technical terrain, making the Cascadia ideal for hikers/runners who prefer a firmer, more responsive ride. The TrailTack outsole is both wonderfully grippy and notably more durable than many competitor models. Thoughtful additions like drain holes and gaiter traps will be appreciated by many hikers.
Read our review of the Brooks Cascadia 15.
Pros: Vibram Megagrip outsole with Traction Lug provides better grip; lighter CMEVA midsole compound; wide toe box.
Cons: Bulky; expensive; maximal cushioning can create lateral instability; flat tongue can be uncomfortable; midsole foam can break down prematurely.
Our reviewer says the Speedgoats’ famously plush midsole is similar to walking on clouds. Pair that with the updated Vibram outsole with Traction Lugs, and you’ve got yourself a dang smooth ride (in a variety of wild color schemes to boot). Despite the extra cushioning and boxy design, the Speedgoats are middle-of-the-road in terms of weight, perhaps in part because they eliminate the rock plate favored by many trail runner models.
Updates to the Speedgoat 5s made them an ounce lighter per pair than the previous model. They’re grippier now too, thanks to the updated Vibram Megagrip outsole, and (somewhat hilariously) a millimeter taller. Hoka also upgraded the mesh upper to a double-layer jacquard mesh made with recycled content, which should help increase durability. For a shoe this cushioned to weigh just 20.6 ounces is pretty remarkable. Lightweight comfort indeed.
Worth noting: this brand seems to be on a dramatic upswing in the thru-hiking world with the number of thru-hikers wearing Hokas increasing year over year in our annual Appalachian Trial thru-hiker survey.
Also worth noting: if you love the look of the Speedgoat but require more ankle support than a trail runner can offer, know that Hoka also offers a mid-boot version of the Speedgoat (men’s | women’s).
Read our review of the Hoka One One Speedgoat 4.
Weight (pair): 21.2 oz.
Rock plate: Midsole top shank
Waterproof: Not available
Pros: Anti-odor insole; near-zero drop; mesh uppers and drain holes in the midsole for quick drying; wide toe box; tacky outsole.
Cons: Some users report durability issues; no waterproof option.
This offering from Astral Designs isn’t a conventional thru-hiking shoe, but it’s a great choice for wet trails with frequent stream crossings. Even more than most trail runners, the TR1 Mesh is unmatched in its ability to drain and dry quickly thanks to lightweight mesh uppers and literal drain holes cut in the midsole. There’s something deeply cathartic about stepping out of a stream and watching water literally spout out of your midsoles.
Add a wide toe box, wonderfully grippy tread (their patented G Rubber excels in wet and slippery conditions), and near-zero drop to the equation and you have a shoe that’s comfortable and deeply appealing for hikers. These shoes are great for wet hikes, but they’ll hold up on a wide array of technical terrains as well.
“I’ve hiked thousands of miles in Astral’s TR1 Mesh model, including miles on the Oregon Desert Trail and the CDT, which together cover practically every terrain imaginable,” said contributor and hiking guru Katie Gerber. “These are my go-to trail runners through spring, summer, and fall.”
Weight (pair): 20.2 oz.
Rock plate: Yes
Pros: Vibram outsole; rock plate; wide toe box; roomy heel.
Cons: Slightly harsh/responsive ride due to protective rock plate; limited colors.
If you love the wide toe box of Altra trail runners but would prefer to avoid the Lone Peak’s zero drop-ness, the Topo Terraventure may be your perfect shoe. It’s wide in the toes, like Altras, and has a modest 3mm drop that will provide more support for heel strikers. Its grippy Vibram outsole also outperforms Altras in terms of traction and is carefully designed for a perfect fit that hits the sweet spot between sloppy-roomy and too tight.
The roomy fit, Vibram rubber, and low drop are characteristics that are shared across all Topo Athletic trail runners, and the Terraventure is the moderate-cushion version of this style. As such, it acts as Topo’s proxy to the Altra Lone Peak, but with real advantages for those who value these. Unlike the Lone Peak’s, the outsole has proven to be exceptionally grippy and durable, with Vibram Megagrip rubber having clear advantages over Altra’s in-house outsole. For this reason, we feel that the Terraventure is a better all-around shoe. No matter if the trail is slippery, rugged, or smooth, the Vibram won’t let you down.
If you prefer a more cushioned ride, Topo’s Ultraventure 3 (men’s | women’s) is a return to form after the previous iteration suffered widespread durability issues. With a lot of the same features that we love about the Terraventure, Topo’s cushiest trail runner is once again ready for the rigors of a long thru-hike with the latest updates to the upper mesh.
Pros: Wide footshaped toebox; grippy Vibram rubber; great durability; cloudlike comfort.
Cons: Heavy; pricey; heel area of the outsole has minimal rubber which limits grip in this area.
Hoka Speedgoats are all the rage these days, but for those of us who like fat cushion and still like the Altra fit, there’s a great option. The Olympus has slowly and steadily made gains on the Altra’s most popular trail runner, the Lone Peak, becoming a common choice among thru-hikers. And it’s easy to understand why. Taking the same roomy fit that is amazingly popular for the all-day comfort, Altra inflates the midsole to an astounding 33mm stack height. Some folks might not like feeling so disconnected from the ground, but once you get used to it, there is no going back — end-of-day foot fatigue is drastically reduced, and the cushion is still going strong hundreds of miles after less plushy shoes begin to feel like cardboard.
The other major improvement over the Lone Peak is the addition of the Vibram Megagrip rubber to the outsole. This compound is noticeably grippier and more durable than Altra’s house blend. Aside from the missing patch located in the arch area, these shoes have confidence-inspiring grip.
Besides being pricey and relatively heavy, the Olympus are awesome shoes for thru-hiking. However, if you want a lighter version with a slightly narrower fit, Altra’s Mont Blanc is also a great shoe that has even better traction than the Olympus. Both of these should last long enough to justify the premium price.
Finally, if you’re not sold on the Altra fit and zero-drop platform, there are other options that provide a soft ride and great grip/durability. The aforementioned Hoka Speedgoats (men’s | women’s) are an obvious choice, but don’t sleep on the Topo Ultraventure 3 (men’s | women’s). All feet are different, and though all these shoes are similar, one pair might just fit better than the others.
Read our review of the Altra Olympus here.
Pros: Lightweight; oversized midsoles add cushioning and shock absorption; gusseted tongue keeps debris out.
Cons: Outsole isn’t the grippiest; some users report issues with fit.
The Challenger 7 is perfect for hikers who love the springy feel of the Speedgoats in principle but find it too squashy to allow for comfortable/efficient hiking in practice. Although this moderately-cushioned offering still rocks Hoka’s signature chunky midsole, it’s noticeably firmer than that of the Speedgoat, which has so much midsole that it can feel stiff and unresponsive compared to the more maneuverable Challenger.
The Speedgoats have a higher stack height and a “stickier” Vibram outsole than the Challengers (which are standard rubber). These features only add to the feeling that the Challenger is a nimbler, more stable shoe overall. It was once Hoka’s go-to model for wide feet, but the brand has since expanded its offerings to include “wide” Speedgoats as well. Despite this, the Challenger still has an overall roomier design.
The Challenger 7, the latest version of this shoe, is fairly different from its previous incarnation (the Challenger ATR 6). Its upper and mid have been constructed with new materials, and it’s also plusher than the previous model thanks largely to an extra millimeter of stack height throughout.
Read our review of the Hoka One One Challenger ATR 6.
Weight (pair): 19 oz
Rock plate: No
Waterproof: Not available
Pros: Graphene grip for enhanced durability and traction; new nitrogen-infused midsole is extremely cushiony and lightweight.
Cons: Expensive; no rock plate; no waterproof option.
Aptly named Inov-8 took a novel approach to their trail runners, incorporating a graphene compound into the rubber outsoles to improve durability and traction. We thought this sounded like a gimmick, but our reviewer tested a pair of Inov8 Terraultra G 270s thoroughly and found them every bit as durable and grippy as advertised: their pair was going strong at 650 miles and counting at the time of the review. This shoe has the same wide toe box and zero-drop that many hikers love in minimalist trail runners.
The G 270 V2 builds on its predecessor, the G 270, with enhanced cushioning, breathability, and durability. There’s also a G 280 with a nitrogen-infused midsole for additional ultralight cushioning. At $170 per pair, these are the priciest trail runners on our list. “But due to their durability, they could end up cheaper over the course of a thru-hike,” testers Joal and Jenny pointed out.
Read our review of the Inov-8 Trailfly G 270 V2.
Weight (pair): 22 oz
Rock plate: No
Pros: Grippy rubber with deep lugs; durable; supportive lacing system.
Cons: Pricey; no rock plate; runs small.
If grip on rugged terrain is one of your most coveted trail runner features, then look no further than La Sportiva. The brand makes kicks with some of the stickiest rubber around. This, combined with a narrower, more precise fit makes their shoes great for high routes and off-trail scrambles. Ditto for mucky stuff. The 6.5mm lugs are seriously deep and are ready to handle sloppy conditions.
To be honest, we have the most extensive experience with the brand’s Bushido lineup, but until the greatly anticipated Bushido III drops, they are going to be difficult to find in all sizes. However, the Mutant brings all of our favorite features to a slightly different fit. With shoe compatibility being so personal, deciding between the two might come down to personal preference anyway, so we have no hesitation in recommending this fine looking shoe.
Even if you love your loose-fitting Altra’s for on-trail cruises, the confidence of reliable traction and slop-free fit when the ground gets sketchy is worth the slightly more restrictive feel.
Read our review of the La Sportiva Bushido II.
Pros: Quicklace system = no more untied shoes or fumbling with laces on freezing mornings; high level of stability and protection.
Cons: Heavy for a trail runner; high heel-toe drop will appeal to some hikers; relatively stiff midsole can be uncomfortable; quicklace precludes precision lace tensioning.
If you’re on the fence between trail runners and burlier hiking shoes, the XA Pro 3D V9 (what a mouthful) does a decent job straddling the line between the two categories. It’s undoubtedly heavy for a trail runner, but it offers more stability and support than minimalist, ultralight models.
In particular, hikers who suffer from heel pain may appreciate the additional support offered by the 11mm heel-to-toe drop. While that might not be much more than other shoes on this list, with superior traction, stability, a rock plate for added protection, and thoughtful features like Salomon’s easy single-pull lacing system, we think it’s the best-executed high-drop shoe on the list.
The XA Pro 3D V9 builds on the iconic XA Pro 3D. It’s two ounces lighter than the original (for the pair) and uses thinner, softer materials. The eponymous “3D chassis,” a thin layer of dense foam between the midsole and outsole that provides additional support and reinforcement, has been redesigned to improve precision, responsiveness, and energy control.
Any offering featuring Salomon’s Quicklace system could also be given the “Best Trail Runner for Raynaud’s Syndrome Sufferers” award, as well, since the single-pull lacing setup is easy to manage, even with cold-addled fingers. (Admittedly, the Quicklace system is polarizing; some hikers hate it with a passion, especially because it makes special lacing techniques like heel lock lacing impossible).
Best Trail Runners for Thru-Hiking: FAQs
Trail Runners or Boots for Thru-Hiking?
Trail runners have surged in popularity in recent years and are now more popular than traditional hiking boots among thru-hikers. If you want to save energy (they say a pound on the feet is worth five on the back), keep your feet relatively cool and dry (trail runners’ lightweight mesh uppers allow moisture to escape quickly), and be able to “feel” and react to the changing trail surface through a flexible, responsive pair of shoes, go with trail runners.
If you want footwear that will last a long time, protect your tender soles from the impact of rough terrain, and provide unyielding foot and ankle support, hiking boots are the way to go. They’re heavier, yes, but they provide a lot more protection. And while they cost more than trail runners up front, they often last two to three times as long, meaning fewer shoes in the landfill and more dollars in your pocket over the course of a thru-hike.
Hiking shoes are essentially low-top boots. They’re beefier and more supportive than trail runners, but not quite as bulky as boots. They’re a good compromise solution if you can’t decide between trail runners and boots.
Hiking Footwear Terminology
Before we dig into our picks for the best trail runners for thru-hiking, let’s first establish some common footwear terminology so that we’re all on the same page:
- Upper: The “main body” of the shoe/the flexible material above the midsole. Usually made of durable mesh or leather.
- Insole: A removable footbed insert located inside the shoe that provides cushioning to your foot. Many hikers upgrade to aftermarket insoles like Superfeet that offer better and more targeted support than the factory version.
- Midsole: The rubber bit between the insole and the outsole.
- Outsole: The grippy rubber bottom of your shoe where all the tread is located.
- Rock plate: A nylon shank found in the midsole of some trail runners to protect your sole from sharp rocks.
- Heel-to-toe drop: The height differential between the shoe’s heel and toe, normally measured in millimeters. The heel is elevated higher than the toe in most shoes so that the toe points slightly down, but some minimalist shoes have zero drop (no height difference between the heel and toe).
Are Minimalist / Zero Drop Hiking Shoes Worth It?
It’s complicated. Minimalist zero-drop footwear is meant to mimic bare feet, the idea being that less shoe support will lead to stronger muscles, improved stability, and a more natural gait. In contrast, many podiatrists argue that cushioning exists for a reason, and wearing unsupportive footwear can create new foot problems and exacerbate existing ones. With that in mind, hikers with flat feet and other pre-existing foot problems should be especially cautious with minimalist footwear.
If you’re considering zero-drop shoes, we recommend you buy a pair or two from a retailer with a decent return policy (we’re looking at you, REI) and try them out on trail. There’s really no other way to know whether a certain style will work for you. If you go the zero drop route, break the shoes in slowly and know that you’ll likely experience calf and Achilles fatigue at first as your muscles adjust. This is normal, but be careful not to push yourself too hard at first lest you hurt yourself.
Check out High Drop or Zero Drop: How to Choose Shoes that Work for You for a detailed breakdown of the respective pros and cons of high and zero-drop shoes.
Many hikers swap out the flimsy insoles that come standard with most hiking footwear for a beefier, more supportive after-market offering. Superfeet, which are available at REI and most other outfitters, are especially popular. If you go this route, swap out your Superfeet every time you replace your shoes to get the maximum benefit out of them.
Yes, they’re a bit expensive, but you won’t be able to finish your thru-hike if you ruin your feet, so this is an area worth investing a little extra. If you really struggle with foot pain, it might be worth visiting a podiatrist and getting custom orthotics that are molded to your unique foot shape.
Finding a shoe that fits your foot perfectly (and finding the correct size of that shoe) is probably the most important step you can take toward blister prevention. Everyone’s foot is different, and there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to this problem: you just have to figure it out through trial and error.
If you’ll be thru-hiking, bear in mind also that your shoe size may increase over the course of your hike. Because you can’t predict whether and to what extent your shoe size will change, we recommend starting with a pair of shoes that fits your feet now, rather than starting a size too big in anticipation of a change that may or may not happen. The start of a thru-hike is challenging enough without adding the difficulty of too-big shoes.
Other methods include:
- Cover potential hotspots with Leukotape as soon as you feel them.
- Slather on some Vaseline to reduce friction.
- Wear a thin, protective pair of liner socks under your primary socks. Opt for toe socks for maximum protection.
- Use the heel lock lacing method to keep your feet from sliding around in your shoes.
Why should you trust us?
Because we’re so incredibly intelligent, of course! Attractive, too. (Not to mention extremely humble).
But if that isn’t enough to impress you, there’s also the fact that everyone who contributed to this article is an experienced thru-hiker with thousands of on-trail miles under their belt. We’re gear nerds who love putting our equipment to the test on trails long and short, and we’ve tested dozens of shoes in pursuit of a smoother, more comfortable hike.
Moreover, we survey hundreds of Appalachian Trail thru-hikers every year to learn about their behaviors, demographics, and—you guessed it—gear preferences. That means our picks for the best trail runners for thru-hiking aren’t just our opinions: they’re based on years of feedback from the thru-hiking community.
This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!
To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.