Gear Review: The Cutaway by Nashville Pack and Equipment Company

There is an undeniable influence on thru-hiking from the ultrarunning community, as evidenced by the growing use of  items such as trail running shoes. However, there are some elements from long-distance running that lightweight backpacking has improved upon and made even better—and packs are a prime example.

Success in ultrarunning relies on efficiency, not only in movement but also in accessibility of gear. Most gear designed for ultramarathons is riddled with pockets and pouches to stuff snacks, drinks, electrolytes, and electronics within reach so that the runner doesn’t need to stop in order to access them.

Taking on an ultramarathon in New Zealand with a typical running vest. This would be too heavy and small for a thru-hike. Photo by Sean Beale.

As hikers continue to push their limits for faster thru-hikes, bigger-mile days, or simply a more comfortable ride, efficiency becomes ever more important. As the demand for this style of hiking has increased, gear manufacturers and cottage companies have responded. A typical ultrarunning vest has a capacity of 10 to 15L with a weight of 12 ounces or more depending on features, bladders, bottles, etc., whereas ultralight packs of this style, such as The Cutaway by Nashville Pack & Equipment Company, tend to have twice the volume (or more) for only a few more ounces, making them ideal for this style of hiking.

The Cutaway at a Glance

Photo by Nashville Pack & Equipment.

Weight: 13 ounces

Volume: 40L (max)

Carrying Capacity: 25 pounds comfort, 30 pounds max

Body Materials: LS07

Available sizes: Smaller and Taller

Price: $230

Features of the Cutaway

Endless pockets on the front straps (six in total) mean you can reach anything without having to take the pack off.

Pockets on pockets. This style of pack, specifically The Cutaway, gives you all the storage you need without extra zippers, pouches, or fabric getting in the way. This pack features ten exterior pockets (including a large polyester/spandex pouch sewn to the bottom of the pack for extra snacks or trash). You can store a day’s worth of nutrition, a water bottle (or two), a phone, camera, external battery charger, tracking device, or just about anything else you’d need to access without having to stop.

Open rear wraparound pocket with mesh. This allows for easy access to the rear mesh pocket without having to take off the pack. Grab a water bottle or your rain jacket without stopping!

Adjustable sternum straps. Loosen or tighten the straps for a more relaxed or aggressive fit depending on the circumstances, and whether a thunderstorm is approaching.

Roll-top snap closure with Y-strap. Easily adjust the volume of The Cutaway by rolling the snap closure down to the appropriate level, which helps secure a tight fit on your gear and less opportunity for water seepage (although this pack is not seam-sealed, the material itself is highly water resistant). The Y-strap secures the roll-top and allows for the attachment of an external bear canister, sleeping pad, or other equipment.

Rolling down the snap closure to get a perfect fit.

Circumstances of Review

As an ultrarunner and AT thru-hiker, I have spent many thousands of hours between a pair of straps and know what I like in a pack. I am also an ambassador for Nashville Pack & Equipment and overall proponent of lightweight backpacking and was provided a Cutaway for the purposes of putting it through its paces. Dozens of hikes and days of testing later, I can see why these packs have become so popular. After using this style of pack, I can’t see myself using anything else on future hikes unless the season warrants it.

Benefits of a Minimalist Running-Vest Style Pack

Joe McConaughy rocking a running-vest style pack during his self-supported Appalachian Trail FKT speed record in 2017. His time of 45 days, 12 hours, and 15 minutes still stands. Photo courtesy of Joe McConaughy.

Freedom. Putting on a large, framed, and heavy pack can sometimes feel like getting strapped in for a roller coaster. You feel encumbered and slightly out of control. By shedding the extra weight and straps, your world opens up and you can experience nature in new ways. When you’re cruising down the brown ribbon with half the average load you feel better, move faster, and are less prone to injury. It doesn’t necessarily mean you have to put in large-mile days, but it gives you options and energy you may not otherwise have.

You figure out your gear. For better or worse, minimalist packs do not allow for the transport of extra heavy loads. This forces you to really think about your gear in new ways and discover how items can have multiple uses, their weight reduced, or simply be left at home or discarded as they are not needed. When you strip away all the excess items on and within your pack, you get to the core of what you actually need to make for a safe and enjoyable trip. Unfortunately, there are no shortcuts to this and each hiker must embark on this journey to determine their ideal kit.

Simplified sizing. The Cutaway is offered in either a “smaller” or a “taller” size, as opposed to most pack manufacturers who provide multiple sizing options depending on the measurement from your hip to C-spine. Because The Cutaway doesn’t have a hip belt, this number is not as important and thus you’re more likely to get a good fit on your first try without fussing with a tape measure or testing multiple packs (as each manufacturer is slightly different).

Drawbacks

Limited capacity. This style of pack is stripped down to its core in order to cut as much weight as possible. As such, your carrying capacity is limited. You won’t be able to comfortably carry loads of 30+ pounds because there is no frame or hip belt to assist with distributing the weight. As such, your gear will have to very dialed-in or you must have the ability to resupply every few days—a luxury not available on all trails.

Temptation to go “stupid light.” Getting your gear weight down to a personally acceptable level can be a long, expensive, and experimental process. The temptation to simply not bring most of your extra clothing, food, or other necessary items is strong as it’s the easiest way to cut your baseweight. However, it can be a dangerous endeavor that can leave you in a tough spot if you’re alone and get injured or caught in extreme weather. Instead, focus on practicing with your gear and cutting weight slowly when and where you are comfortable doing so.

Wait time. Most packs of this style, The Cutaway included, are made-to-order and can be customized to varying degrees. While this does provide an enhanced customer experience, it also means that you may have to wait weeks (or even months) for delivery of your new pack depending on the demand and manufacturing capabilities of the company. For those leaving on a long trip in short order, this can be a significant obstacle. The solution, of course, is to plan far in advance but sometimes that simply isn’t an option.

Comparable Minimalist Packs

The Cutaway hits the mark in a lot of areas for me as a thru-hiker because of its light weight, large capacity, and details such as the trash pocket and dual sternum straps. However, that’s not to say it’s the best choice for everyone. Here are a few other options for those who may value other features:

Ultimate Direction Fastpack Series
$120-200
17 ounces to 26 ounces, 15L-45L

Pa’lante Joey
$210
11.8 ounces, 28L
(Used by Joe McConaughy for his 2017 Self-Supported AT FKT)

YAMA Mountain Gear Sassafras  
$250
22.3 ounces, 34L

Little River Packs The Peak
$200
10 ounces, 30L

Mountainsmith Zerk 40
$220
28 ounces, 40L
Used by TheTrek editor-in-chief Zach Davis during his 2019 Long Trail thru-hike)

Takeaways

Ultrarunning and lightweight backpacking continue to swap ideas and improve on equipment, and running-style packs are a trend that has taken a strong foothold as it’s one of the best options for cutting your baseweight. This type minimalist pack is not ideal for all trips, but every hiker could certainly benefit from taking a closer look at their setup to lighten their loads and make for a more comfortable journey.

Choosing a pack will always be a highly personal decision, especially given the multitude of viable options. While The Cutaway is just one of many packs in this niche market, its features stand out among competitors and would be a great choice for ultralight backpackers—especially those transitioning from an ultrarunning background.

To check lead times or purchase the Cutaway, visit Nashville Pack & Equipment Company’s website.

 

 

Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 8

  • Otter : Mar 2nd

    I used an Arc Blast on my AT hike, after I lightened up. I have never used a beltless pack, even when carrying loads that are probably doable without a belt.

    Could you comment on the feel of wearing a “vest pack” like the Cutaway versus a belted pack? I know it’s difficult to put into words, but I’m trying to get a sense of things before I spend $230 on (another) pack!

    Thank you for the review!

    Reply
    • Brandon : Mar 2nd

      Hey Otter!

      I hear you on having too many packs :). The best way I can describe the ride difference between this and a framed pack with a hip belt is that it fits snug to your back and will sit a little higher. The straps don’t have any foam but are wider than traditional ones, so the extra surface area helps dissipate the pressure. To get the perfect fit you’ll need to pack it efficiently (nothing pointy against your back, heavy items in the center, etc.) and be sure not to overload it for long periods of time. I still love the pack and am using it on an upcoming trip to South Africa!

      Reply
  • Brianna : Apr 25th

    Have you done much running with the pack, or mostly hiking? If you’ve run with it, what are you thoughts? Do you notice any bounce when weighted or unweighted? Thanks!

    Reply
    • Brandon Chase : Apr 27th

      Hi Brianna,

      I have mostly hiked with this pack but have jogged short sections and experienced minimal bounce. It somewhat depends on your load weight and how tightly it’s packed, but since this is a frameless pack you can cinch it down pretty well.

      Reply

What Do You Think?