Gossamer Gear LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles Review
I’d barely heard of trekking poles when my mom lent me hers for my solo trip around Nepal’s Annapurna Circuit in 2011. I was skeptical, but thought, “yeah, those mountains are pretty high,” and so begrudgingly agreed to bring them. Although I made some questionable packing choices on that trip, like carrying the first four Game of Thrones paperbacks and 26 Clif Bars, bringing trekking poles was not one of them. They came off my pack halfway through a brutal climb on day one, and I didn’t pack them up until my bus ride to Kathmandu, 23 days later. I came home a trekking pole convert, and have used them ever since.
Trekking poles are now ubiquitous on trails across the globe and there are many ultralight shelters that rely on them for structure. Carbon fiber construction is all the rage as the ultralight gods turn their gram-shaving gaze to the humble walking stick. Gossamer Gear has offered some of the lightest trekking poles for years, and their newest, the LT5 Three Piece Carbon Trekking Poles, honor that heritage while cutting the collapsed length significantly. A touch heavier and more complex, but much more portable. Are the LT5s the next step or a step back?
Gossamer Gear LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles At-a-Glance
MSRP: $195 (pair)
Type: Three-piece telescoping
Weight: 5.1 ounces each (using my own scale)
Length Range: 24-51in (60-130cm)
Adjustment System: Twist-lock
Shaft Material: Carbon fiber
Minimum Length: 23.5in (60cm)
Intended Use
Trekking poles aren’t for everyone, but if keeping your sticks light is a priority, then the LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles might be for you. Gossamer Gear strives to offer some of the lightest backpacking gear on the market, and their Lightrek (LT) line of poles has followed that ethos since the beginning. While previous iterations sacrificed packability, the LT5s three-piece telescoping design allows them to pack small for transport on or in a backpack. These are light poles that pack small, which is a great combination for just about anything, from thru-hiking with a trekking pole shelter to stashing in your car trunk for impromptu day hikes.
Circumstances of Review
August 2022 Update: These poles rule. I’ve now used these for well over 3,000 miles of hiking, including the rugged Sierra High Route and the rooty, rocky, gorgeous mess of the Appalachian Trail. The tips needed changing once, but other than that they have handled it all without issue. I’ve seen other carbon poles shatter, yet the LT5’s keep on charging. The high price definitely feels justified now.
I worked the LT5s hard on a 74-mile loop in the Eagle Cap Wilderness in Eastern Oregon and on a few smaller adventures near Mount Hood. The terrain was tremendously rocky at times, and unmaintained trails kept me off balance in places where balance is important. These poles served me well whether I was hanging off them near the tops of arduous uphills or saving my knees on jarring descents. Additionally, I used them to pitch my tarp and The DCF Two on a handful of nights that ranged from “damn, I really hope I can find the trail after all this snow” to “nice enough to cowboy camp.”
LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles Features
Carbon Construction: The three-piece shaft of the LT5s is made completely of carbon fiber. Carbon is lightweight, strong, and durable when used correctly. It also boasts better-than-aluminum vibration dampening properties. However, it’s not all good news. Carbon poles cost a bunch more than aluminum poles and when they fail under high stress, they fail catastrophically. Aluminum poles, on the other hand, will bend if forced above their load rating, but will probably still be useable.
Three Pieces: The carbon shaft of each pole is divided into three, telescoping tubes. Previous versions of Gossamer Gear’s trekking poles used two-, or one-piece shafts. The extra division makes these the most packable version yet with a 23.5in minimum length. The middle section of each pole has printed length marker lines, yet confusingly, these are omitted from the bottom section, which makes consistent lengthening a challenge.
Twist Lock: Lock the telescoping sections in place with the intuitive twist locking mechanism. There are two per pole. While some hikers find that twist locks are finicky to get just right (I agree), they are the lightest option. I have used twist lock trekking poles for several thousand miles of backpacking with minimal frustrations, although I have always been envious of the alternative, flick lock designs.
EVA Foam Grips: They look kinda like cork, but the grips on the LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles are definitely 100% EVA foam. I like the feel and sweat-absorbing qualities of EVA foam a lot, and the LT5 grips are as comfortable as any other grips I’ve used.
Carbide Tips: This is the standard these days. Carbide is supremely durable and will last for many moons. If the tips wear out (nice work!), they are cheap and easy to replace.
Updated Wrist Straps: The new wrist straps are undoubtedly cushy. Easy to adjust too. Just make sure you’re using them correctly by inserting your hand up through the bottom of the strap. I hiked the entire PCT before I learned how to do it the right way, which is way more comfortable and better looking.
Extras Included: A pair of LT5s includes removable baskets and rubber tips. Gossamer Gear recommends using small baskets when hiking in rocky terrain, and the tips provide grip on hard surfaces.
Twist Locks: Elegant, Imperfect
Twist locks are simple, lightweight, and low-profile. Clockwise to tighten, counterclockwise to loosen. My trekking poles have mostly used twist locks, yet I’ve never fallen in love with them. In my experience, twist locks require a fine balance between tightening too little and too much. Too little and the poles will shorten unexpectedly under loading, which could be bad news depending on where you are. Too much and it might be nearly impossible to loosen the locking mechanism again. These issues are exacerbated by large temperature swings which cause the shafts to expand or contract, thus loosening or tightening their hold on the twist lock. During some extremely cold sections on the CDT, I went days without being able to adjust my poles when the aluminum contracted and tightened.
The LT5s are my first carbon poles and I hesitate to twist as tightly as I do with my trusty aluminum poles. Perhaps I’m being paranoid, but the thin carbon doesn’t provide the same reassuring ‘bottoming out’ sensation as metal. It’s a similar feeling to driving a metal screw into plastic threads, like if I go too far then the carbon will break. This leaves me unsure of whether or not I’ve tightened the LT5s enough to hold my weight. Hardly reassuring. For what it’s worth, however, the poles haven’t collapsed on me yet.
Packability
The LT5 trekking poles are Gossamer Gear’s most packable to date. With the addition of a third telescoping section, they collapse down to 23.5 inches. This is a little bit smaller than similar three-piece telescoping trekking poles. Folding poles pack the smallest at around 15 inches, but the LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles will satisfy most requirements. As someone who has wrestled two-piece trekking poles into airplane luggage and awkwardly stowed them on my backpack for hitchhiking, I really dig how compact Gossamer Gear made these poles. The extra packability comes at the cost of a few added grams and an extra twist lock to mess with. However, I feel that these tradeoffs are certainly worth it.
A couple of lines of paint short of a picnic.
Anyone who has used three-piece trekking poles will be confused by the LT5s. Instead of having pole length printed on the middle and bottom sections (usually in cm), the bottom is blank. This leaves the middle section measurements feeling arbitrary, or at least imprecise. A 120cm pole won’t be anywhere near that length if the bottom section is only deployed halfway. This is a small issue that’s easy to overcome with careful observation, but it makes it nearly impossible to track whether or not the bottom section is slipping due to inadequate tightening of the lower twist lock. I really wish Gossamer Gear would just paint a few more lines here. They already go through the trouble of printing a “STOP” mark.
Pros
Low weight: At only 5.1 ounces each, these might be the lightest adjustable trekking poles on the market. More than once, I’ve heard a bearded wise man tell me that “an ounce on your feet is like eight on your back,” when discussing hiking shoes. I’m not sure about the conversion from arm-ounces to back-ounces, but keeping weight in your hands to a minimum makes sense to me. The energy savings might not matter on a day hike, but over the course of a thru-hike, those calories add up. If you use trekking poles for the full-body workout, look elsewhere. Leg day, every day.
Comfortable: The cushy wrist straps and soft foam grips still felt good on my hands after several long days of hiking. My hands sweat a lot, at all times, and the EVA foam never felt slick or chafe-y.
Replacement sections available: If carbon poles do break, there’s no way to repair them. Fortunately, Gossamer Gear sells LT5 replacement sections so you don’t need to buy an entirely new pole.
Collapse small: Poles that pack small are a lot easier to deal with when you’re not on the trail. The collapsed length of the LT5s makes them easy to pack inside or strap to the outside of a backpack for those times when you need to go hands-free.
Cons
Price: At $195 per pair, the LT5s are some of the most expensive trekking poles on the market. Blame the carbon fiber if you want, but there are other carbon poles to be had for $50 less. Aluminum poles will save you even more at the expense of added weight.
Twist Locks: For all the advantages of twist locks (smaller, lighter), they are still tricky to get just right. It can be hard to grip the trekking poles tightly enough while wearing gloves or with cold hands. Gossamer Gear makes it more difficult to get things perfect by not providing length adjustment marks on the bottom section.
Concerns with carbon: Carbon fiber is an awesome material that blends high strength with low weight, but it’s far from perfect. While an aluminum pole will bend when overloaded, resulting in a misshapen (but still useable) tool, a carbon pole will splinter and shatter. This is cause for concern in extremely remote locations where replacement poles are unavailable. The strength of aluminum poles also resists nicks and dings better than carbon and is better suited to handle unexpected forces due to its uniform material properties. Trekking poles see a ton of abuse, especially in rocky terrain. Even though I use carbon fiber poles, I trust aluminum to handle it better and last longer.
Overall Value
If weight is of the utmost importance, I believe the LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles are a great option. They are certainly some of the lightest poles on the market and I love how small they pack down. The price feels a bit high to me though, especially with so many other carbon poles to choose from. My other criticisms are all minor and won’t keep me from using the LT5s for many miles to come. And if I do bust a section, it’s nice to know that I can replace it without also busting my burrito budget.
Shop the Gossamer Gear LT5 Carbon Trekking Poles
Similar Trekking Poles
Zpacks Carbon Fiber Trekking Poles
MSRP: $99
Weight: 7.2 ounces each
REI Co-op Flash Carbon Trekking Poles
MSRP: $139
Weight: 7.4 ounces each
Black Diamond Alpine Carbon Cork Trekking Poles
MSRP: $179.95
Weight: 8.6 ounces each
Mountainsmith Andesite Trekking Poles
MSRP: $99.95
Weight: 5.6 ounces each
Leki Micro Vario Carbon AS Trekking Poles
MSRP: $229.95
Weight: 8.9 ounces each
This product was donated for purpose of review.
This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!
To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.
Comments 14
Got a pair last year. Snapped the bottom section on some PA rocks. The twist lock didn’t inspire a lot of confidence but never broke when I tightened it as hard as I could. Help up my duplex just fine with no slipping.
That’s good to know about tightening the twists. I guess I shouldn’t worry about really cranking on them.
What a bummer about breaking a pole. Did you replace the busted section? How’d that transaction go?
My mom ask what I wanted for Christmas and I told her the bottom section to an LT5 hahah. Not the greatest gift but I need it. It’s just $35 so not terrible. It was the very bottom right at the top of the tip that snapped off, so I put the rubber foot on over the broken part and extended the bottom section a little farther. Made it fine the rest of the 100 mile section I was doing
Awesome, way to work with what you got! I hope Santa hooks you up with a new section. You deserve it!
Impressed by their lightness, I purchased a pair a few months ago (hint: wait for GG’s sale and save ~$40) to replace a pair of Aging BD Alpine Cork poles. Thus far the LT5s have functioned without fail. I find the twist locks don’t need tremendous force to keep the pole sections tight. As GG suggests, keep the sections clean. Dirt and grit are the enemy of the locking mechanism. A great product from a great company.
Thanks for the input, Larry! It’s true that even though I’ve never tightened the twist locks to my maximum, the poles have never compressed more than a few millimeters, even during a 25-mile day. And you’re right, keeping the poles grit free is essential.
You may have already figured this out already, but the way the measurements work on these is: you set the bottom section to the “stop line.” Then you just use the top section as the measurement. At first you might think this is weaker because you are not used to extending the pole to the “stop line” – don’t worry its not. One of the things they do with carbon poles is make the thinner sections a little thicker carbon and/or shorter. For example the GG LT5 tip end is only 18.75 in and the center and top are 19.25 and 19.5in.
Thanks for the info, Mikey! I did eventually figure out that the bottom section is supposed to extend to “STOP”. Makes sense, but a little freaky. And that’s pretty cool about the adjustments they make for carbon poles. It never occurred to me that the thickness of the carbon might vary from section to section.
really surprised you didn’t figure that out on your own
So how have the LT5’s held up? I just recieved a set (my 1st set I’ll add) the other day and cant make out what to think. I definitely love the weight, the grips seem ok enough, i do not like the twist locks for the same reasons you’ve pointed out. I bought these poles with an AT thru hike in mind however I am hesitant to believe theyll survive, especially rocksylvania. Thanks for the great review
Weeeeeell, I actually haven’t put them to much use yet in 2021, maybe about 100 more miles. Unsurprisingly, this hasn’t given me enough cause to amend nor confirm my original assessment. However, let’s touch base in August. There’s a big test coming…
For what it’s worth, I wouldn’t hesitate to use the LT5’s on the AT. I’m thinking about using them myself on that trail.