Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads for Thru-Hiking in 2026

It may not be as sexy as a tent, backpack, or sleeping bag, but the humble backpacking sleeping pad is just as critical (and often just as expensive) as the much-touted Big Three.

The warmest sleeping bag in the world won’t do you much good if you’re lying on the cold, hard ground without a mattress. Because a crappy night’s sleep is the fastest way to ruin the trip of a lifetime, you should opt for one of the best backpacking sleeping pads for your next thru-hiking adventure.

Quick Navigation

Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads for Thru-Hiking

• Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT (Most Popular Pad for AT Hikers)
• Klymit Insulated Static V Lite (Best Pad for Hammocks / Best Budget Inflatable)
• Exped Ultra 8R (Warmest Thru-Hiking Pad)
• Nemo Switchback (Best Foam Pad / Most Affordable Overall)
• Therm-a-Rest Trail Prolite (Best Self-Inflating Pad)
• Nemo Tensor Elite (Lightest Inflatable Pad)
• Big Agnes Rapide (Thickest Sleeping Pad)
• Gossamer Gear Thinlight (Best Supplemental Pad)
• Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads for Thru-Hiking FAQs
• Sleeping Pad Life Hacks

The Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads for Thru-Hiking

Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT (Most Popular Pad for AT Thru-Hikes)

Klymit Insulated Static V Peak (Best Hammock Pad / Best Budget Inflatable)

• MSRP: $99
• Weight: 22 ounces
• R-Value: 4.2
• Dimensions: 72″ x 23″ x 2.5″

What We Love

If you want the comfort of an inflatable without a whopping price tag, the Static V line is your best bet.

Furthermore, the Static V is one of the best thru-hiking sleeping pads for active sleepers and larger people because of its generous 23-inch width and inclusion of side rails to keep you from slipping off the edge. Those features and the eponymous V-shaped baffles, which help to cradle the body, make the Static V line a favorite among hammock campers as well (Klymit also used to make a hammock-specific pad, but it’s pretty heavy and is on final sale).

The Insulated Static V Peak is a new addition to an already dizzying array of pads within the Static V collection. We think it’s the best option for backpackers due to the affordable price point, generous R-value, and reasonable weight penalty. We used to recommend the Insulated Static V Lite, but the new Peak version is somewhat cheaper and significantly warmer for only a few extra ounces. It also uses burly 75D polyester fabric, which should be a lot more durable/abrasion-resistant than your typical pad.

This pad is also available in standard, wide, ultralight, and non-insulated versions, but we think the Static V Lite offers the best balance of affordability, weight, and insulation. The pad is relatively quick to inflate, requiring only 10–15 breaths. This is a major selling point for many, as it makes a much-reviled camp chore easier.

We asked readers to weigh in on the comfort of the V baffles, and the verdict is that the design IS more comfortable than that of most traditional pads.

 Noteworthy Features

• V-shaped baffle design: Mimics the muscular structure of your back for maximum comfort.
• Synthetic insulation: Boosts the R-value to a balmy 4.2 (note that this is the industry-standard ASTM R-value; Klymit still reports its own historic in-house R-values on some pads, but many consumers agree that the brand tended to overestimate the warmth of its own pads. In this case, the 4.2 should be relatively accurate according to industry standards).
• Flip valve: Inflation in as few as 10 breaths, plus fast deflation
• 75D polyester on top and bottom.

Nobody’s Perfect

I (hi, it’s Kelly!) find the Static V line’s widely spaced baffles a bit unsettling, even though they’re decently warm and comfortable in practice; if I want to prop myself up on my elbows, they can easily slip into the cracks between baffles.

The Static V Lite’s biggest drawback is that it weighs over half a pound more than the Therm-a-Rest NeoAir XLite NXT for essentially the same R-value.

TLDR

Pros: Warm; affordable (best value for an inflatable pad); quick and easy inflation; wider than most (hammock-friendly); comfortable overall

Cons: Fairly heavy; too easy for elbows to slip into uninsulated gaps between baffles

Return to top

Exped Ultra 8R (Warmest UL Sleeping Pad)

• MSRP: $230
• Weight: 16 oz (M) / 19oz (MW) / 20 oz (LW)
• R-Value: 8.8
• Dimensions: 72 x 20.5 x 3.5 in (M) / 72 x 25.6 x 3.5 in (MW) / 77.6 x 25.6 x 3.5 in (LW)

What We Love

Swiss-made Exped sleeping pads have been growing in popularity in the US in recent years, and readers have been hassling us to include more of their products in this list. With a reputation for comfort and durability, it’s easy to see why Exped users are so loyal. On top of that, the brand is now putting out sleeping pads with a warmth-to-weight ratio that rivals heavy-hitters like Therm-a-Rest and Nemo. 

The Exped Ultra 8R is actually a skosh warmer and lighter and cheaper than the Nemo Tensor Extreme Conditions pad, making it hard for us to not recommend it. Exped makes an even warmer (R-value 10) pad in its Ultra line for just 22 ounces — we chose not to highlight that one because the R-value, while impressive, really and truly seemed like overkill for thru-hiking. But if you’re in the market for the literal warmest sleeping pad possible, technically, the Ultra 10R is the way to go.

Regardless of which mat you choose, common features of the Ultra line include centering side rails to keep you from sliding off the edge of the mat mid-sleep, pillow attachment tabs, and separate flat valves for inflation and deflation. The pad achieves its phenomenal warmth-to-weight ratio with a standard combination of reflective internal layers and synthetic insulation (in this case, recycled microfiber). 

Noteworthy Features

• Dedicated inflate/deflate valves: In a world where many modern sleeping pads utilize a single two-way valve for both inflation and deflation, Exped has opted for a more straightforward design with separate one-way valves for inflating and deflating.
• Side rails: The pad features vertical baffles running the length of the mat, and the two outermost baffles are somewhat thicker than the inner ones, keeping you cradled in an insulated, synthetic embrace all night long.
• Soft-touch face fabric: Recycled 20D ripstop polyester face fabric is soft to the touch and more eco-friendly than virgin polyester, but the low denier does raise questions about long-term durability.
• Valves located at the bottom of the pad: Almost every pad has the valve on the top-facing side, but Exped places it underneath so it sits against your tent floor. This keeps it from interfering with your pillow game, but have fun if you need to adjust the inflation in the middle of the night.
•  Head-to-toe baffles: Weld points at the end of baffles are a common failure point in inflatable sleeping pads. This design minimizes those potential weak spots, enhancing durability.

Nobody’s Perfect

The valves being on the bottom side of the pad is a touch inconvenient if you need to add or release air overnight. Although Exped says their 20d recycled polyester is exceptionally strong, it’s still only 20d (which is in range but on the thin side for a sleeping pad).

One tradeoff of the Ultra 8R’s exceptional warmth-to-weight ratio is that it’s only available as a mummy. This is too bad since rectangular sleeping pads provide more ground protection overall, a feature that would probably appeal to hikers who have need of an R-value this high.

TLDR

Pros: Continuous vertical baffles for comfort and durability; non-slippery; taller outside baffles; recycled fabric; accurate and insanely generous warmth rating

Cons: Inconvenient valve placement; relatively thin fabric on top and bottom; no rectangular option

Return to top

NEMO Switchback (Best Budget Sleeping Pad / Best CCF Pad)

• MSRP: $55 – $60
• Weight: 14.5 ounces (Reg.) / 10.5 ounces (Short)
• R-value: 2.0
• Dimensions (in.): 51″ x 20″ x 0.9″ (Short) /72″ x 20″ x 0.9″ (Reg.)

What We Love

The Nemo Switchback took the classic and already popular closed-cell foam (CCF) sleeping pad and made improvements all around. A cleverly designed dimple pattern nests smaller while providing more thickness and comfort, and a reflective film bumps the R-value to 2.0, which is just adequate for three-season use. At 14.5 ounces, the Switchback is lightweight, and it’s easy to use scissors to shorten it and cut ounces.

It is also extremely rugged and ready for the rigors of a long thru-hike. Unlike inflatable sleeping pads, it can never pop, and since it takes just seconds to deploy, the Switchback is a versatile pad that’s useful for snack breaks, lunch breaks, second lunch breaks, and trailside naps, in addition to sleeping (especially if cowboy camping). Last but not least, at $60 for the regular size, it’s cheap enough for a thru-hiker on any budget.

Switchback vs. Therm-a-Rest Zlite Sol: What’s the difference? Not much. As mentioned below, the Switchback packs down smaller, but there’s only so much you can differentiate one CCF pad from the next. Still, if you want a detailed breakdown of the differences, check out the following comparison.

READ NEXT – Therm-a-Rest Zlite Sol vs. Nemo Switchback: The Ultimate Comparison

Noteworthy Features

• Reflective coating: The shiny metallic coating boosts warmth by reflecting body heat back to the sleeper. NEMO recommends pointing the shiny side down.
• Nesting dimples allow the pad to pack down smaller than the Therm-a-Rest Zlite Sol.

Nobody’s Perfect

The big downside to CCF pads like the Switchback is comfort (or lack thereof). Even though NEMO’s version is comfier than the competition, it will cause all but the hardiest sleepers to toss and wiggle in search of a position without pressure points. This pad style works best for those who sleep on bellies or backs, while side sleepers may prefer a thicker inflatable pad.

Despite the satisfying accordion-style nesting, the Switchback is bulky and will need to be carried outside of a backpack. Also, the relatively low R-value of 2.0 limits its usefulness when summer begins to fade.

—Owen Eigenbrot

TLDR

Pros: Inexpensive; comfortable (for a foam pad); low-profile so you can’t slip off; durable; quick to set up (no huffing and/or puffing required); can double as a jumbo sit pad; more packable than the competition

Cons: Uncomfortable compared to inflatable pads; low R-value; low warmth-to-weight ratio compared to inflatable pads

Return to top

Therm-a-Rest Trail Prolite (Best Self-Inflating Pad)

• MSRP: $135 – $155
• Weight: 24 oz (Reg.) / 30 oz (Reg. Wide) / 32 oz (Long)
• R-Value: 3.8
• Dimensions (in.): 72″ x 20″ x 2″ (Reg.) / 72″ x 25″ x 2″ (Reg. Wide) / 77″ x 25″ x 2″ (Long)

What We Love

The Trail Prolite is heir to the old Prolite Apex, beloved of our review team and our previous pick for the best self-inflating pad. The new version comes in at more or less the same warmth, weight, and price point. The pad’s expanding foam core self-inflates, so you only need a few breaths to top off the pad, adjusting the firmness to your liking. From start to finish, setting up this pad should take under three minutes.

Like the Prolite Apex, the Trail Prolite has a reputation for incredible comfort and durability (in fact, its 75D polyester face fabric is a lot beefier than the 50D fabric used in the old version of the pad). Alongside the ease-of-use provided by a self-inflating pad, these features can justify the few extra ounces for many hikers.

Therm-a-Rest uses industry standard temperature ratings that translate well to real-life experience. Our reviewer tested the old version of the Prolite, which was also rated to an R-value of 38, down to 25 degrees Fahrenheit and still found it comfortable.

Noteworthy Features

• Self-inflating: If you give it enough time, it will fill almost entirely.
• Packability: This won’t compete with an ultralight sleeping pad in terms of packability. But, when comparing it to other pads of a similar weight / R-value, the packability here wins.
• 75D polyester on the top and bottom makes this pad very durable.

Nobody’s Perfect

This pad does self-inflate, but this isn’t an instant process and you’ll still need to top it off with a few breaths at the end. It’s not too heavy by self-inflating pad standards, but certainly nowhere near the lightest or the best warmth-to-weight ratio on this list. Now that portable, ultralight sleeping bag air pumps are a thing, one wonders if self-inflating pads will continue to make sense for thru-hiking.

TLDR

Pros: Very comfortable; good R-value; good price-to-R-Value ratio; convenient (self-inflating)

Cons: Self-inflation process is a bit slow and still requires a few breaths to top off; heavier than many pads on this list

Return to top

Nemo Tensor Elite (Lightest Inflatable Pad)

• MSRP: $220 – $260
• Weight: 7.6 oz (Short) / 8.5 oz (Reg.)
• R-Value: 2.4
• Dimensions (in.): 60″ x 20″ x 3″ (Short) / 72″ x 20″ x 3″ (Reg.)

What We Love

Ever since the Therm-a-Rest Uberlite was discontinued a few years back, there hasn’t really been a super-ultralight inflatable on the market to take its place — until now. The 8.5-ounce Tensor Elite dropped at the beginning of 2025, and reports on durability have been overall positive so far.

It’s made with very thin 10D Cordura nylon — which, while Cordura fabrics are generally high quality, does make us break out in a light sweat. While reports of premature failure have not been totally absent from the interwebs, the Elite appears to be holding up to real-life use better than the uber-poppable Uberlite did. 

People still managed to make the Uberlight last an entire thru-hike by babying it a little, and they’re likely to attempt the same with the Tensor Elite. The siren song of a three-inch thick inflatable pad that only weighs half a pound is just too powerful to ignore. This is the lightest inflatable sleeping pad ever to exist, and we have to give Nemo a nod for that.

An unexpected side benefit of the Elite? It’s quiet. “I expected this pad to be light when I ordered it, but I wasn’t expecting it to be so quiet,” wrote reviewer Alex “GPS” Brown. “With minimal foil-based insulation and smooth shell material, the Tensor Elite is probably the quietest inflatable pad I have used. It doesn’t crinkle when bent and has minimal ‘swooshing’ when rolling over with layers on.”

GPS put the pad through its paces with some shoulder-season Colorado peakbagging and a trip to the San Juans. He says the pad performs true to its temperature rating and recommends limiting its use to nighttime temperatures above 38-40 degrees Fahrenheit.

Noteworthy Features

• Discontinuous Baffles: Minimize excess baffle material, saving weight. The fact that the baffles don’t go all the way across the pad from one end to the other also makes the pad feel less ‘directional’ in stiffness, which GPS said was a slight step up in comfort for him.
• UL nylon: Besides the baffle design, the exceptionally thin 10d nylon fabric used in this pad is responsible for the bulk of the weight savings.
• Laylow valve: The Elite still features Nemo’s recessed and nested Laylow nested valve system, which is easy to use (although GPS would have preferred a different location).

Nobody’s Perfect

It’s not that insulated, has limited sizing options, and GPS says the valve is a bit hard to use because of the location. The big question on everyone’s mind, of course, is the durability. This is a thru-hiking website; will a 10D, 8-ounce pad hold up to long miles and hard use? While some thru-hikers have reported using the pad for all or part of the AT/PCT, functionally, many hikers are still likely to be hesitant about the inherent risk of putting that much strain on such a featherlight mattress.

TLDR

Pros: Insanely ultralight; comfortable baffle pattern; three inches thick

Cons: 2.4 R-value isn’t that warm; durability is questionable; recessed valve is a little hard to inflate by mouth

Read our review of the Nemo Tensor Elite here.

Return to top.

Big Agnes Rapide SL Insulated (Thickest Backpacking Sleeping Pad)

• MSRP: $160 – $230
• Weight: 17 oz (20″ x 66″) / 18 oz (20″ x 72″) / 19 oz (20″ x 78″) / 23 oz (25″ x 72″) / 25 oz (25″ x 78″)
• R-Value: 4.8
• Dimensions (in.): 20″ x 66″ x 4.25″ / 20″ x 72″ x 4.25″ / 20″ x 78″ x 4.25″ / 25″ x 72″ x 4.25″ / 25″ x 78 x 4.25″

What We Love

If you’re looking for the lightest possible pad, the Rapide ain’t it — but if you want to put as much distance between yourself and the hard, rocky, rooty ground below, this is probably the best choice you can make. At 4.25 inches thick, the Rapide is one of the thickest sleeping pads money can buy while still staying in a reasonable range for weight and warmth. Indeed, Big Agnes has long had a reputation for making some of the thickest sleeping pads on the market. 

Like the Exped Ultra line featured above, the Rapide features separate one-way valves for inflating and deflating the pad, keeping the design simple and minimizing the risk of accidental deflation when you just want to top off the pad with a few extra puffs during the night.

The pad uses two layers of heat-reflective film within the pad as insulation to boost the R-value to 4.8, more than enough for most thru-hikers’ needs. 

Noteworthy Features

• 4.25-inch thickness is already three-quarters of an inch more than the next-thickest pad on this list. The thickness is the main selling point of the Rapide over other sleeping pads.
• Separate inflate/deflate valve: Less fiddly than combined inflate/deflate valves. No guesswork and no finesse needed.
• Offset I-beam construction: Whatever this means, right? The pad essentially has full-length vertical baffles, and Big Agnes says its proprietary design enhances comfort and multidirectional support. Do with that information what you will.

Nobody’s Perfect

Despite its thickness, the pad’s R-value of 4.8 is just middle-of-the-road, and many users claim that the pad feels functionally colder than that. This is a common complaint with Big Agnes pads in general (reports of delamination are also common with this brand). 

TLDR

Pros: Very thick; comfortable; reasonable blend of warmth, weight, and cost; idiot-proof dual valve system

Cons: Many users say it’s not as warm as the claimed R-value; questionable durability

Return to top.

Gossamer Gear Thinlight (Best Supplemental Sleeping Pad)

• MSRP: $22 – $32
• Weight: 2.7 oz (Rolled) / 3.3 ounces (Folded) / 4.4 oz (Rolled Wide)
• R-Value: 0.5
• Dimensions: 59″ x 19″ x 1/8″ (Rolled version) / 73.5″ x 19″ x 1/8″ (Folded version) / 59″ x 25″ x 1/8″ (Rolled wide)

What We Love

One-eight-inch pads are too minimalist to work as standalone sleeping pads, but that’s not the point of this item (unless you’re a hardcore ultralighter). Instead, these pads are meant to protect and supplement your existing sleep system. R-values are additive, so stacking this pad underneath another one will boost the insulation factor.

These pads actually have an excellent warmth-to-weight ratio for closed-cell foam: theoretically, stacking two 1/4-inch foam pads would achieve the same R-value as a traditional CCF foam pad at significantly less weight. As an added bonus, they can double as backcountry dog beds, yoga mats, tramily-sized sit pads, and hammock pads.

Note: Mountain Laurel Designs sells a similar pad in an 80-inch length, which may be ideal for taller people. Otherwise, the two are functionally similar in most ways. The more you know.

Nobody’s Perfect

At the end of the day, the Thinlights just aren’t that warm. Even as a supplemental pad, a boost in R-value of just 0.5 or 1 might not be enough to justify the added expense and bulk. Next time I head out in the snow, I’ll probably still opt for a thicker CCF pad to layer under my inflatable.

TLDR

Pros: Great warmth-to-weight ratio; all the versatility of a traditional CCF pad at a fraction of the weight and bulk; enhances the warmth of your existing sleep system while protecting it from abrasion and punctures

Cons: Not a huge boost in warmth; likes to fold and twist under active sleepers

—The Editors

Return to top

Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads for Thru-Hiking: FAQs

Is a sleeping pad necessary for thru-hiking?

Unless you’re sleeping in a hammock with an underquilt, a sleeping pad is essential to provide ground insulation and cushioning for virtually every backpacker.

Foam pads are ideal for minimalists and are 10000% reliable, while inflatables are the most popular sleeping pads for thru-hiking (at least for anyone who wants a more luxurious night’s sleep).

The only backpackers for whom a sleeping pad is not essential are hammockers, who have the option to use an underquilt for insulation instead. (And even then, many hammockers prefer pads for the ease of use and the flexibility to “go to ground” on a shelter or hostel floor).

It should be noted that quilt users will be even more reliant on their pads for warmth than sleeping bag users due to the whole no-back thing. So if you’re a quilt user, be sure to pay extra attention to R-value.

Foam vs. inflatable sleeping pads: which is better for thru-hiking?

Data suggests that most thru-hikers prefer inflatable sleeping pads —75% of AT hikers in our 2025 survey went this route — but it’s a matter of personal preference. Inflatables are certainly more comfortable and tend to have a better warmth-to-weight ratio, but foam pads are more durable, versatile, cheaper, and can hold up well to the rigors of a multi-thousand-mile trek.

It’s an entirely personal choice, as both have pros and cons. Closed-cell foam (CCF) pads are more versatile and durable than inflatables at a fraction of the cost. They set up instantly and can double as sit pads and yoga mats.

On the flip side, inflatable pads are more comfortable and, more importantly, often much warmer. A typical foam pad has an R-value of just two, which is only adequate for summer and shoulder season use for warm sleepers. Inflatable backpacking pads, in contrast, can have R-values of five, six, or even eight.

Winter hikers will often layer a foam pad underneath a high-R-value inflatable. The foam pad adds to the system’s warmth while also serving as a backup if the inflatable fails.

Are three-quarter-length sleeping pads worth it for thru-hiking?

We generally recommend getting a pad that’s long enough to fit your entire body, unless you’re an experienced ultralight hiker and you know you’re fine with sacrificing a bit of comfort to save weight.

Back it up: what are we even talking about? Full-length sleeping pads are typically around 72 inches long. Many pads are also available in 66-inch or even 48-inch lengths, too. These shorter pads are perfect for smaller individuals, but tall people make them work by using the pad for their torso while resting their legs on top of their pack or extra clothing.

Because they use significantly less material, short pads tend to cost and weigh a lot less. There is a definite trade-off in comfort, which may or may not be worth it to you.

What is a good R-value for a sleeping pad?

Most thru-hikers experience three-season conditions on their journeys and should aim for a sleeping pad R-value between 2 and 4 (aim higher if you sleep cold).

R-value is a measure of a material’s resistance to heat transfer (i.e. how well it insulates). Mathematically, it’s the temperature difference from one side of an insulating barrier to the other divided by heat flux (the amount of heat flowing through the barrier per unit of area per unit of time).

R-values aren’t unique to sleeping pads. They’re also used to describe building insulation and other materials. For instance, the walls of a typical insulated home have an R-value between 13 and 19.

R-values typically range from one to nine in backpacking sleeping pads. Until recently, outdoor brands used their own methodologies to measure the R-values of their sleeping pads. In 2020, the industry adopted a standardized methodology called ASTM F3340-18, by which all pads are evaluated so consumers can more easily compare across brands. This has been a huge benefit for consumers, as some brands saw their R-values cut nearly in half under the new standards.

Remember to choose an appropriately rated bag or quilt to complement your pad, as the two will work in concert to keep you warm.

• An R-value of 1 or 2 is suitable for summer trips in warm environments.
• An R-value of 2-4 is suitable for spring, summer, and fall trips in warm to cool environments. Most inflatable pads are in this range.
• An R-value of 5-7 is best for winter use in cold environments.
• An R-value higher than 7 is darn warm. In the past, we’ve said that such pads are heavy and better suited for car camping than backpacking, but ultralight sleeping pad technology is starting to push the envelope here (see the NEMO Tensor EC, Therm-a-Rest NeoAir Xtherm NXT, and Exped Ultra 8R).

Return to top

Sleeping Pad Life Hacks 

• Paint a few strips of silicone seam sealer on the bottom side of your pad to keep it from slipping and sliding on your tent floor. A few strips on the top will also help keep you from sliding off the pad in your sleep.
• If you’ll be using your breath to inflate a sleeping pad, sit down before you start and take your time — especially at higher elevations — to avoid dizziness.
• Rechargeable mini air pumps for inflating your sleeping pad are a thing now, FYI.
• If you’re trying to keep your base weight down and/or are on a tight budget, choose a 3/4-length pad and put your backpack under your legs to keep them warm and supported.
• Slip a sleeping bag liner over your pad like a box sheet for luxurious comfort and less squeak. Especially effective for quilt users.
• Locate leaks by submerging the pad in water and following the trail of bubbles to the pinhole. And on a related note…
• Bring the patch kit that came with your inflatable pad when you bought it. It weighs next to nothing, it will prolong the life of your inflatable, and someday it will save you from a crappy night’s sleep on a partially deflated pad.

Return to top

Why should you trust us?

Because we’re so incredibly intelligent, of course! Attractive, too. (Not to mention extremely humble).

But if that isn’t enough to impress you, there’s also the fact that everyone who contributed to this article is an experienced thru-hiker with thousands of on-trail miles under their belt. We’re gear nerds who love putting our equipment to the test on trails long and short, and we’ve tried just about every sleeping pad under the sun in pursuit of a better night’s sleep in the backcountry.

Moreover, we survey hundreds of Appalachian Trail thru-hikers every year to learn about their behaviors, demographics, and — you guessed it — gear preferences. That means our sleeping pad picks aren’t just our opinions: they’re based on years of feedback from the greater thru-hiking community.

Check out AT hikers’ favorite sleep systems from the 2023, 2024, and 2025 surveys.

Alexander “GPS” Brown, Rachel Shoemaker, and Owen Eigenbrot contributed to the most recent update of this list.

Featured image: Graphic design by Chris Helm.