Interlude (Day 67+): Purist Thru Hiking Defined

Are You a Purist?

I saw a Facebook post the other day where some confused soul needed to know what percent of thru-hikers were “purists.” The post’s comments section did little to answer this ever-so-important question, and soon devolved into name-calling, mostly by worthless slack(pack)ers and other members of the tainted rainbow of off-color blazers. Even the humble-brags offered up by a few self-proclaimed purists did little to settle the issue.

The ATC, LDHA, USOC, NCAA, and REI rulemakers have all failed to adequately define AT hiking purity. Simply letting hikers make up their own standards of purity doesn’t work because the rest of us won’t be able to judge whether someone else’s hike is truly pure. And that simply will not do. The thru hikers of Appalachia need, nay demand, a standardized thru hiking purity litmus test.

I Am The Incident and I Am Here to Help

Fellow AT hikers, I hear you. I am a problem solver. I have conclusively established, once and for all, the definition of a purist thru-hike. I have stepped up as the final arbitor of purity on behalf of all hikers. Who better?

Let me start with my qualifications. First and foremost, I have not yet completed a thru hike. Therefore, as clearly demonstrated by any internet forum comment section, I am the most qualified to render opinions on the matter. My armchair and keyboard have imbued me with knowledge unavailable to those with worn-out shoes and smelly packs.

Second, I am no whites-only blazer. I have blue-, aqua-, yellow-, black-, brown-, platinum-, red-, no-, and bike-blazed parts of the AT. ‘Tis true that I have strayed from the one true trail, but my sins allow me to see the pinnacle of thru-hiking’s mountain of purity with greater clarity, unlike those lofty souls laboring up the holy mountains’ white-blazed path who are buried in tunnels of green and so shrouded in mists of glory.

Purist Thru Hiking Defined. Finally!

Here now is the definitive summary of a “pure” thru hike’s characteristics:

  1. Every Inch. Purists must walk every inch of the official ATC approved trail. And yes, I mean every inch. Without question, if a hiker leaves the trail to dig a cathole, sleep in a shelter, or run from a bear, they must return to the exact point they left it. Preferably, they will place their foot precisely over the outline of their last footprint before continuing north.
    1. The following are not valid reasons for leaving the precise AT alignment:
      1. Venomous snakes coiled in a striking position direction on the trail. Go fast and hope for the best. The pure have nothing to fear.
      2. Same for bears, skunks, porcupines, banjo-playing yokels, or tick-infested overhanging vegetation.
      3. Bridge out. If the official bridge is closed or has been swept away by flooding, the purist must still ford the river or cross the freeway on the bridge’s or road’s original alignment. If they are swept downstream by the torrent or carried away on the front grill of a semi, they must go back and try again, taking care to place their foot in the exact spot they left the trail.
      4. Tree falls. Never, ever leave the trail to go around a fallen tree. Always climb under it, keeping direct contact with the hallowed official soil of the trail. Failure to do so not only negates purity, it causes untold environmental damage to the surrounding forest.
      5. Poorly marked trail sections. When a purist encounters a poorly marked trail, they should send a non-purist scout they trust ahead to ferret out the exact location of the official trail to make sure they do not accidentally step on unholy ground.
      6. Crossing the street. In towns like Hot Springs and Damascus, where white blazes are found on only one side of the street, hiking on the other side of the street for any reason is not allowed. If the official sidewalk is closed or blocked, the purist must wait at the blockage for it to open again.
    2. Remediating Errors. Should a hiker fail to return to the exact point where they left the trail, they have 24 hours to remedy the error. Failure to do so, invalidates the entire hike. They must start over at Springer to qualify for a pure thru hike.
    3. Getting Lost. Purists do not get lost. Any thru-hiker who loses the trail for more than 10 standard hiking strides must start over at the Springer Approach Trail.
    4. Stride Length. Long-legged hikers should take care to not take too long of a stride, as that can be considered skipping short portions of the trail.
    5. White Blazes. While it is not required, those who do not physically touch each white blaze with the same ungloved hand will receive an asterisk next to their name embroidered on their purity sash, to be awarded upon completion of their thru hike. Tapping blazes with a trekking pole is also impure.
    6. Slackpacking is the antithesis of hiking purity, even if one’s slackpack weighs more than an ultralight hiker’s pack, it is the spirit of the thing that counts. Leaving stuff out of a pack you don’t need that day is impure. Unless, you are going ultralight, in which case it is extra pure.
    7. Pack Weight. See slackpacking. A purist’s pack must be heavy. But not too heavy, or they’re stupid. Or too light, because that would be cheating. Unless they are an ultralighter, in which case they are automatically pure. Defer to ultralighters in all things. They know best. Note: It may be prudent to independently weigh an ultralighter’s pack with all the stuff they actually carry, as they have been known to fudge their numbers and accidentally leave out a few items before weighing it.
    8. Reversing Direction. North is the only pure direction. Hiking south on a northbound thru hike, except to remedy an error of foot placement or as the second part of a yo-yo, is impure. Purists should not even associate with flip-floppers.
    9. Beards. Purists must wear unkempt beards. Hairy legs and armpits may be substituted by those unable to grow beards to the required disgusting, food-trapping length. Purists do not trim, groom, or comb out their beards (or leg hair & pits) between Springer and Katahdin. Picking food out of one’s beard with a stick does not count as grooming if one eats whatever they find.
    10. Tramilies. Have you really hiked the AT if you don’t have a tramily? Of course not. Two types of tramily are accepted as pure: (1) With Drama, and (2) With More Drama.
    11. Assistance. A true purist accepts no food, money, or any other kind of assistance during their hike. This includes trail magic. A purist walks by trail magic with eyes averted while emanating hiker purity. It also includes medical emergencies. A purist would rather die in the woods than borrow a tourniquet from a passing hiker.
    12. Rides. A true purist may not ride in any kind of vehicle between Springer and Katahdin.
    13. Purists only camp in their own tents or ATC-built shelters. Motels, hostels, homes, and RV’s are verboten for pure purists.
    14. Zero Days. Purists take less than five zero days, all of which must be taken directly on the trail in a tent or shelter. Really pure purists do not zero.
    15. Approach Trail. Purists must hike the Springer Mountain Approach Trail, passing under the stone archway in Amicolola State Park and touching the plaque on Springer Mountain with the same foot used for their first step through the archway.
    16. Katahdin. Purists must carry their full pack with all their camping equipment up Katahdin. In addition, they must do it because “they just don’t feel right without it.” It is NOT weird that they’ve just spent five months preaching to anyone who will listen about the need to lighten their pack by removing everything they don’t need.
    17. Documentation. Purists should photo-document or video themselves (with GPS tracking turned on) each time they leave and re-enter the trail.
    18. Witnesses. A minimum of two reliable witnesses are required to document thru hiker purity. Anyone self-identifying as hiker trash is not considered reliable. Or safe. Or sober.
    19. Southbounders. Those miscreants can do whatever the hell they want.

Post-Modern Purity

A subclassification of purity is also recognized and is called a Post-Modernist Purist Thru-Hike (PMP). The following are allowable for post-modernist purists:

  1. Hostels. Although staying in grimy, noro-infested hostels is preferred, staying in luxury private rooms at hostels, or even quaint, pricy B&B’s, is acceptable for PMP hikers.
  2. Motels. Cheap hotels shared with more hikers than legally allowed by local fire codes is preferred. Nice hotels known to have doors that properly lock, beds built after the Eisenhower administration, or working plumbing may invalidate true purist status and trigger post-modernist purity status. If, however, the hiker is “tired” or worried about the weather, then by all means, they may stay in whatever hotel for as many nights as they want without violating their PMP hiker status.
  3. Hitchhiking. Hitchhiking is allowable if the driver is drunk or stoned, legally blind, or talking and driving while looking over his shoulder. Exceptions for sober drivers will be made if the PMP hiker rides in the back of a pickup during a rainstorm or if they stand or sit above the truck’s side panels. Alternatively, PMP hikers may take any type of ride if they are tired, in a hurry, or just don’t feel like walking that far.
  4. Trail Magic. Of course, accepting trail magic is PMP approved. How could accepting food and supplies you didn’t carry yourself be considered anything but pure? Don’t be ridiculous. Same for running out of food because you expected those stupid trail magic people to stick around long enough for you to get to their feed. Can you believe they didn’t have vegan and gluten-free options? Morons.
  5. Zero Days. Zero days have no bearing on PMP purity. Unless a hiker takes too many according to those who’ve seen them do it and are not part their tramily.
  6. Ultra-Light Equipment. Ultra-lighters are the vegans of the hiking world. They are imbued with extra sanctity that covers a multitude of other types of impurity. How do you know if someone is an ultralighter? Wait five minutes, they’ll tell you.
  7. Stuff that You Like to Do. If you feel like doing it, then it’s okay and does not alter your PMP status. But if other people do it and you don’t, it’s assuredly a PMP violation.
  8. Documentation. Simply claiming to be purist, especially if done on social media, is sufficient to prove one’s PMP status. As long as you think you’re pure, and say so publicly, you are.

I have filed papers to form a legal entity to enforce these purity standards. I’m calling it the “Ultra Pure Hike Your Own Real Hike Society” (UPHYORS).  Whenever someone says they’re a purist, just think UPHYORS. You probably already were.

You’re welcome. Donations accepted.

t

The UPYHORS salute.

Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 57

  • Very well done 😁 : Jun 18th

    Very well done. Love the sanctimonious sarcasm 👍

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Who doesn’t love sarcasm?

      Reply
      • Robert McCall : Jan 20th

        Sure. Sarcasm is really funny….not

        Reply
        • Jon : Jan 20th

          Can’t tell if you’re being ironic or critical, but either way, thanks for reading.

          Reply
  • Cynthia R : Jun 18th

    I’ve enjoyed all of your posts but this one made me laugh ‘till I cried. #4 Stride Length and #7 Pack Weight – genius.
    Wish everyone could just accept ‘hike your own hike’.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Well said. Thx!

      Reply
  • Janice A Smith : Jun 18th

    Thank you for a laugh out loud moment. That acronym is killer!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      My pleasure.

      Reply
  • Mike Rogers : Jun 18th

    Let us know when you finally find something you do like!?!??

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      I like to laugh. And I love the trail. Thx for reading.

      Reply
  • Julie : Jun 18th

    UPHYORS- you’re quite an entertaining read!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Thx!

      Reply
  • Roz : Jun 19th

    This should be a legal document that everyone must sign at Springer before receipt of their hangtag. Signed, THE Incident fan club member.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Thx Roz!

      Reply
  • Alison : Jun 19th

    Trying to breathe now. Best thing I’ve read about the trail in forever.
    Thanks too much!🤣

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      My pleasure.

      Reply
  • Homeward : Jun 19th

    Oh my, Mr. Incident. Is this your farewell address to the Trail? If not, you might consider adding a weapon to the Purist’s Heavy Pack or hiding a stiletto in your mangy, overgrown beard. The Purist Police may be gunning for you :-).
    Thanks for making me laugh and reminding me of some interesting shelter conversations :-).
    Peace and Comfort!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      On my way back right now. Hiking tomorrow.

      Reply
      • Homeward : Jun 19th

        I am SO glad to hear that! Take care.

        Reply
    • Mike Nixon : Jun 24th

      Hey Jon, glad to see you back on the trail…and back on your game!!!

      Back about 20 years ago, I was doing recruiting for the High Point Police Dept. My Major at the time had a good sense of humor, that not many people were aware of. One day, he walks into my office and said he had come up with a new recruiting slogan…”We’ve upped our standards; up yours!”

      Reply
      • Jon : Jun 25th

        Lol!

        Reply
  • thetentman : Jun 19th

    Just wow! Best post ever. Very funny. So this is what you think about when you are hiking. I am still giggling.

    HYOH!

    Cheers.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Thank you, sensei. Heading north again tomorrow.

      Reply
  • Papjack : Jun 19th

    Bravo, Jon

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Thx!

      Reply
  • Shocktop : Jun 19th

    As a lowly section hiker, I probably shouldn’t even have read this (joke!) but I am glad I did. Beautiful! Thank you!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Lol. As long as section don’t make eye contact with thru hikers they’re ok.

      Reply
  • Shelly : Jun 19th

    And I thought I died from laughter yesterday about another AT bloggers post…It’s Gold Jerry! Gold!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 19th

      Thx!

      Reply
  • Phyllis : Jun 19th

    Thank you for being you!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      You’re welcome. Count on it!

      Reply
  • Lish : Jun 19th

    Long time listener, first time caller. Purity is overrated. Your sarcasm is not. Thank you for this laugh and my appreciation for Northstar grows daily.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Mine too!

      Reply
  • Jeff Greene : Jun 19th

    As a guy who has maxed out at a two night backpacking trip, I’ve felt unworthy of judging how others do the AT and PCT, but armed with this list of rules, the COURT OF JUDGMENT is now in session!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Haha! My work here is done.

      Reply
  • Crowsfeet : Jun 19th

    Brilliant.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      🙂

      Reply
  • Ellen R : Jun 19th

    This is a riot! Cannot wait for the UPYHORS website to go live. You did an amazing job of capturing every single “judgemental” scenario. This was a fun read. Thank you.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      My pleasure.

      Reply
  • Jan : Jun 19th

    I have been following you since Springer. I had to send you Kudos for the best “The Trek” blog I have read. In 4 years of reading! You made my year!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Wow. You made my day!

      Reply
  • Kate B : Jun 19th

    Mr. Incident, we unanimously vote you in as Chair of UPYHORS, Summer 2023.
    Hoping this post marks the return of a season to smile again.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      I accept. And yes, I think it has.

      Reply
  • Ruth Morley : Jun 20th

    So, so very fine! You hit every nail on the head. It’s a hike, folks, get over it! And I absolutely love the acronym and the salute. It took me a second to get them, and then they were all the more brilliant. Now I have to go back and read your previous posts. Thank you for this.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Welcome. And thanks!

      Reply
  • Nick D : Jun 20th

    This is one of the best posts I have read on this site, keep it coming!

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Thank you!

      Reply
  • Scott Layman : Jun 21st

    What do I think? I think that is fantastic. The same type of thinking is prevalent in the motorcycle touring community. I might need to work on a list. When do you get into PA, perhaps I can buy you a beer or dinner or both. Wait, I’d better reread that list….

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      PA in two weeks I think. Free beer? Always.

      Reply
    • Nancy : Jul 16th

      This is hilarious! That acronym is brilliant 🤣 Thank you for the answering such an important question. Hopefully this gets printed out and distributed to all the hostels to spread awareness.

      Reply
      • Jon : Jul 19th

        I live to serve. 🙂

        Reply
  • Anna : Jun 22nd

    I haven’t laughed ’til I cried in quite awhile! May I print this out and have it as a worthwhile read at my near-trail brewery?

    Reply
    • Jon : Jun 22nd

      Absolutely. Have fun with it! Perhaps a copy over the dartboard too?

      Reply
  • DB3 : Jul 10th

    This was glorious to read! Had all of the tongue and cheek one needs. Good on you sir.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jul 19th

      Thanks DB3.

      Reply
  • Robert McCall : Jan 20th

    From a purist perspective, the only thing I think is defendable – if you’re going to call yourself a “Thru-hiker” – is meeting the ATC definition of Thru-hiker. Anything else is into non defined space and is therefore is N/A.

    Reply
    • Jon : Jan 20th

      Have you thru hiked the AT? There’s a segment of the hiker crowd (and the online community) that really overthinks the whole purist thing, and spends way too much time getting people’s faces about whether someone else did a “real” thru hike. I’m just having a little fun with the idea of purity. Totally a non serious post…the result of hiking alone for months with time to think.

      But I agree with your conclusion: the ATC’s definition seems reasonable and allows for lots of permutations.

      Reply

What Do You Think?