Going Pharr as a Phemale: Gender Equality on the AT

In the summer of 2013, I thru hiked the Appalachian Trail with my boyfriend, Mark. We make a pretty good team. When I abandoned him to spend six months working and living on the Pacific Crest Trail we wrote each other a letter every day, mailing them in giant misshapen bundles that were subjected to great speculation by post office security. We managed to stay together through two cross-country road trips, multiple job changes, and years of my 4AM work schedule. We even met each other’s families. Reasonably assuming we could weather any storm together, we began a 2200-mile hike.


Mark and I finally reaching our home state.


I should explain my background. The trail crew I was a part of had intentionally hired equal numbers of men and women, and I found that the women who joined were often even hardier than the men, perhaps because they felt like they had to fight, or overcompensate, to be in a physical job like that. In addition, my job at home was in a fast-paced, occasionally crass, almost entirely female kitchen. I hadn’t really thought about it, but I was accustomed in my professional life to working with strong, powerful women and acquiescing, mild-mannered men. So when I left the urban NorthEast and stepped off the bus in rural Georgia, I became quickly aware that things had shifted.

Sometimes, men would make eye contact only with Mark while they talked to both of us, or offer more help to me, or even ask Mark questions about me as if he were my handler instead of my partner. I began to feel like there was a certain distrust of women in outdoor endeavors that masqueraded as chivalry. On our first night, for instance, we had one man tell us matter-of-factly that ‘most women couldn’t handle the trail.’

“I see you brought your pack horse here, though, so I guess you’ll just make him carry all the weight.” He gestured to Mark, my 6 foot 3 inch hiking partner whose Slovakian heritage tended to make him look out of place in his office cubicle.

“Actually,” Mark said while I quietly seethed, “Maggie has more experience backpacking, so she’ll be carrying more weight for the first few weeks until I adjust.”

Our fellow hiker, leering at him out of the side of his eye, looked much like I suspect Teddy Roosevelt did when he famously stated that he could ‘carve a better man out of a banana.’

This was the first time – but unfortunately not the last – that I would come to understand people expected less of me on the Appalachian Trail because I was a woman.

The reality, though, is that nearly a third of the Appalachian Trail Thru Hikers this past year were women. Women are appearing in the woods in record numbers, sporting hairy legs, a keen ingenuity, and an amazing endurance. They are breaking other records as well. People have undoubtedly heard of Jennifer Pharr Davis and her 46 day record for the fastest supported thru hike of the AT.

Related reading: Scott Jurek Sets New Appalachian Trail Speed Record


You would think that her success would set a new standard of excellence for people to aspire to, but Davis’ laudable accomplishment has actually led to fewer men attempting the supported record. Instead, men are now going for the unsupported record in full force. Unsupported hikers carry their own pack, whereas supported hikers are met by people at road crossings who provide food and shelter. The supported hikers have greater advantages, and so their accomplishments are weighed on a separate scale from unsupported hikers. In other words, supported hikers are in a separate category, not to be compared with unsupported hikers.

Despite this fact, I have heard men on trail spout the disclaimer “well, being supported by her husband is hardly hiking the AT.” I can’t imagine ever saying “a marathon hardly counts when there are helpers handing out water and food.” In what other pursuit does rejecting additional difficulty negate the accomplishment of the original goal? Suddenly, ‘supported hiking’ is under attack for its validity. It seems like the addition of a woman to the annals of speed-hiker fame has served to detract from the esteem of the category that she hiked in rather than add to respect for women as athletes.

This is hardly a new phenomenon; it is a pattern that we seem to be doomed to repeat. There will always be a temptation to tear down the strongest people in our society because we interpret their success as an offense to our own inadequacy. What a beautiful world we would live in if the men who wanted to challenge the new speed record on the AT were willing to risk losing to a strong, resilient competitor who also happens to be a woman.


Did I mention that the youngest Triple Crowner was a girl?


Reed ‘Sunshine’ Gjonnes hiked the PCT at age 11, the AT at age 12, and finished the CDT in 2013 at age 13, making her the coolest girl ever.

Interestingly enough, the unsupported record for the PCT belongs to a woman – Heather ‘Anish’ Anderson, who hiked the PCT in 60 days the same year that I crawled along the AT in six months. Even more impressive, she was only one day, 9 hours behind Josh Garrett’s record – also set in 2013 – for the fastest supported thru-hike (and she blew the previous unsupported thru-hiking record out of the water by four days).


I have always wondered what the handful of disparaging male hikers I met in the summer of 2013 would say now about Anish and her unsupported PCT record. Would the tables turn? Would they admit awe and appreciation? Or would they argue that “Josh did it faster?”

Just to be clear, every person who has attempted – and especially, who has succeeded at – any thru-hiking record is an incredible human being and far above my personal powers of comprehension. I’m not trying to reclaim respect for women by putting down men’s accomplishments. I can’t even imagine saying, “well, if I was supported the way Josh was, I could hike the PCT in 59 days.”

I couldn’t hike the PCT in 59 days if I had magical powers and a unicorn with a saddle.


Josh Garrett, putting the ultra in ultralight.

The words of a few should never speak to general opinions. The hiking community, as a whole, is extremely equal opportunity. I’ve actually felt more included and accepted on the trail than in most areas of life. These complaints might sound petty and pedantic, but they refer to the dark corners of a culture that still exists even in America – one in which women are second-class citizens. These attitudes might be considered outdated, old-fashioned, or completely obsolete, but I can assure you that they are not yet. There are still new waves of anti-feminism. There are online forums that disparage women. There are organizations that support conservation who still prefer to hire men over women. Even in the most powerful nation in the world, misogyny remains systemic.

Feminism isn’t trying to say that women are better than men; It’s about equality. It’s about any person, regardless of their background, being able to make it from Springer to Katahdin.


This is true: the men I met on trail who were respectful and conscientious far outweighed the men I’m complaining about. The close, platonic friendships I developed with several of them helped me to mentally survive hard times on the trail.

The experience of hiking the AT with friends of both gender and with Mark, who I have since married, gave me a lot more appreciation for those trail legends – Pharr Davis, Anish, Josh Garrett, and Matthew Kirk, who holds the unsupported record for the fastest AT hike. In order to keep their demanding pace, they had to sacrifice the companionship of others. One of the greatest and most overlooked challenges speed-hikers face is loneliness.


An exhausted Matthew Kirk, sans body fat.

Although the physical support Pharr Davis’ husband gave her was enormously important, I can’t shake the feeling that the emotional support he gave her was probably even more essential to her success; that having another human being to talk to at the end of the day might have made the difference between succeeding and falling short of her goal.


Jennifer and Brew Pharr-Davis

Before anyone can criticize a record holder, they should consider that no athlete is an island; every strong person succeeds because of a combination of internal ability and external support, and the latter does not detract from the former, but rather helps it to be the most it can be.

This makes me ask myself the difficult question: could I have done this without Mark? It was a popular topic between us while we marched through green tunnels – especially after he did become a stronger hiker and carry more weight than me. We have both wondered if we could have accomplished what we did alone. I think back to all the times that one of us had to play the strong person to compensate for the other one’s weakness.

But then I realize that we didn’t support each other by leaning against one another; rather, I liken my six months with Mark to being on a see-saw. It was a constant balancing act between two people attached by a common goal – and we never let each other touch the ground.


Affiliate Disclosure

This website contains affiliate links, which means The Trek may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. The buyer pays the same price as they would otherwise, and your purchase helps to support The Trek's ongoing goal to serve you quality backpacking advice and information. Thanks for your support!

To learn more, please visit the About This Site page.

Comments 14

  • zrdavis : Feb 25th

    This is the best. You are the best.

  • Bushy : Feb 25th


  • beckon4 : Feb 25th

    Speaking as a woman….Yes you could have done it alone. I did at age 51. Loneliness made it harder. I certainly didn’t break any records but just finishing it is accomplishment enough. Nice article. I must add that there are many more women out there than there were back in the 70’s -90’s. Unfortunately some of the jerks with their mean comments about women exceeding them have stuck in my memory all too much.

  • Jen : Feb 25th

    I tend to take it as a twisted sign of progress that I am always really taken aback by the sort of disparaging attitudes you’re talking about. They’ve become rare enough (at least in my experience) that they strike me as curious and startling, where once they would have been routine. It’s amazing to me how so many assumptions based on sex, race, or other such characteristics have endured for hundreds if not thousands of years, despite the fact that they crumble when tested against the evidence. Well, if anything is going to hold me back from the things I want to do, it will at least be a real limitation and not a culturally instilled one.

  • Andrew Christian Repp : Feb 25th


  • Warren Doyle : Feb 26th

    Very well-written. The only thing I can add is during the 2014 hiking season their were seven AT record attempts – all men – four attempts at Jen’s supported record and three attempts at Matt’s unsupported record. All failed and I’m sure that two commonly held, but not valid, beliefs were part of their failure 1) “That Jen is a ‘girl’, and boys are stronger (better) than girls; and, 2) “Jen walked the trail and since I’m a runner of course I can do it faster than her.”
    Also, “the if you don’t backpack the entire trail you are not a real hiker” mentality is cross-gender and not just a male thing. I, and others, have been the object of much derision for day-hiking the trail. (It is an extension of “If you don’t go to war to fight for your country, you are a coward” perspective.

  • thecountesscoco : Feb 26th

    YES! Fantastic post.

  • Angie LOL Holbrook : Feb 28th

    one of the phrases that raises my blood pressure is, “i would never want my mother/daughter/wife/sister out there on the trail by herself.” like we can’t handle ourselves?!?! have faith in us as human beings! your mother birthed you! she can put one foot in front of another and hike, dammit!

  • Molly Bybee : May 22nd

    So many feelings. Truly phenomenal article.

  • Jessie GG : May 22nd

    Maggie, I always love your articles- but especially love this!

  • Chuck Crookshanks : May 22nd

    Who ever and how ever a hiker completes the trail is not as important as the fact that they have reached a goal that not very many accomplish. Good article. Happy Trails.

  • Paul Boulay : May 22nd

    The gender issue is all about equality. The whole phenomenon of ranking people by the relative speed of completion of the AT thru-hike is all about INequality. It is in my view incompatible with most people’s AT experience, which is all about personal growth.

    A supported “hike” has more in common with a runner’s marathon, an extended foot race. I question the use of a National Scenic Trail for a foot race as superfluous. They would have had an equally valid experience if they had used roads and a camper. So why bother using the AT for this activity?

    A typical, traditional thru-hike is a trek, as an extended backpacking trip. The physical and psychological burdens, and the logistical challenges build character and benefits a person for the rest of their life.

  • Leanne Martinez : May 23rd

    I think the men who don’t view woman as equal human beings are fundamentally supporting their own poor self esteem. It is quite odd to be ignored in a conservation… Any man capable of allowing this isn’t worth my time, thoughts or energy. I have experienced this and turn my heel. Thankyou for bringing this to light.

  • Matt Perrenod (Homeless'15) : May 24th

    Thanks for this. It’s worth mentioning, I think, that Anish now holds the FKT for an unsupported AT thru. I met her when she was 8 days into her hike, crossing into New Hampshire. Took me 4 weeks to cover that same distance in the other direction. What a hiker.

    And here’s Jen on women and FKTs: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/04/sports/on-the-longest-hiking-trails-a-woman-finds-equal-footing.html?_r=0

    I am seeing more women doing long distance hikes, and posts like this encourage the trend. Good all the way around.


What Do You Think?